Official test rankings since WW2

[wpdavid]

Can anyone direct me to these? Apparently they have been produced retrospectively back to 1952 and I fancy a browse.

 

[trundler]

ICC Test Batting Rankings : Top 100 Rated Test Batsmen

ICC Player Rankings

www.relianceiccrankings.com

 

[Howe_zat]

Right back to 1877 on the ICC version.

 

[AndrewB]

Team rankings (which do go back to 1952) are at https://web.archive.org/web/2012110...cricket.com/match_zone/historical_ranking.php

 

[wpdavid]

Thank you all.

 

[stephen]

How tf is Labuschagne anywhere near Stokes? Crazy.

 

[morgieb]

How tf is Labuschagne anywhere near Stokes? Crazy.

That's what happens when you average 70 for a year, in some quite tricky conditions too.

 

[stephen]

That's what happens when you average 70 for a year, in some quite tricky conditions too.

Stokes has played far more memorable innings over the last two years though. Seems like Labuschagne's cashing in at home has disproportionately helped his rating. I mean the jury is still out over whether this is merely a purple patch or a batsman who has matured and come good.

 

[Howe_zat]

If Stokes cashed in a bit more at home we probably wouldn't drop so many home tests tbh

 

[morgieb]

If Stokes cashed in a bit more at home we probably wouldn't drop so many home tests tbh

Yeah Stokes's main thing is that he's an uphill skiier. Still an excellent batsman but he's not quite a Smith/Kohli-esque banker in most conditions. Labuschagne might be.