Kinda spilt on them always. Victor has the bigger rep, peak and hence, iconic innings; as well opened regularly. But Ranji averaged a Good 13 runs more, despite playing much more in England. Will go with him, just.Luffy going against trumper is interesting
Ranji's an interesting character.And Johan going against the Englishman
I will note here I am also taking into account FC records due to their relative importance of the time. Check out his record in FC vs Hobbs’ pre-war.Hobbs is definitely above Ranji
Yes, but Ranji was extremely fortunate to have Hove as his home ground, it's quite a high scoring ground. Most of the wickets in England of that era were extremely difficult but the Sussex home wicket, in the 1900 season, had a run-per-wicket exceeding 33.5 (high scoring, even in modern terms) and I'd assume that trend followed. That's why I think Ranji's (56) and Charles Fry's (50) First class records flatter them.I will note here I am also taking into account FC records due to their relative importance of the time. Check out his record in FC vs Hobbs’ pre-war.
Yeah but even if that boosted their averages by 4 runs each their averages are still imperious for the time.Yes, but Ranji was extremely fortunate to have Hove as his home ground, it's quite a high scoring ground. Most of the wickets in England of that era were extremely difficult but the Sussex home wicket, in the 1900 season, had a run-per-wicket exceeding 33.5 (high scoring, even in modern terms) and I'd assume that trend followed. That's why I think Ranji's (56) and Charles Fry's (50) First class records flatter them.
their records are Excellent, even if somewhat inflated.Yeah but even if that boosted their averages by 4 runs each their averages are still imperious for the time.