• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Kumar Ranjitsinhji vs Victor Trumper

Ranji vs Victor


  • Total voters
    8

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
I find it hard to rate them both against modern batsmen. Particularly Ranji. Comparing them against one another is much easier.

I think Ranji was the greatest pre WWI batsmen besides Grace and probably Hobbs.
 

Johan

International Coach
I will note here I am also taking into account FC records due to their relative importance of the time. Check out his record in FC vs Hobbs’ pre-war.
Yes, but Ranji was extremely fortunate to have Hove as his home ground, it's quite a high scoring ground. Most of the wickets in England of that era were extremely difficult but the Sussex home wicket, in the 1900 season, had a run-per-wicket exceeding 33.5 (high scoring, even in modern terms) and I'd assume that trend followed. That's why I think Ranji's (56) and Charles Fry's (50) First class records flatter them.
 
Last edited:

ataraxia

International Coach
Yes, but Ranji was extremely fortunate to have Hove as his home ground, it's quite a high scoring ground. Most of the wickets in England of that era were extremely difficult but the Sussex home wicket, in the 1900 season, had a run-per-wicket exceeding 33.5 (high scoring, even in modern terms) and I'd assume that trend followed. That's why I think Ranji's (56) and Charles Fry's (50) First class records flatter them.
Yeah but even if that boosted their averages by 4 runs each their averages are still imperious for the time.
 

Top