PlayerComparisons
International Captain
.
Era. It was a high scoring era where 70% of matches were drawn. Almost no great bowlers. Barrington was never seen as a great in his timeBarrington easily, 58+ averaging Bat is kinda crazy
you really wanna discuss pitch quality in a thread involving Ravichandran Ashwin?Era. It was a high scoring era where 70% of matches were drawn. Almost no great bowlers. Barrington was never seen as a great in his time
Yea people think Barrington and Boycott played in hard eras when the opposite is likely trueEra. It was a high scoring era where 70% of matches were drawn. Almost no great bowlers. Barrington was never seen as a great in his time
He may have played in a relatively high scoring era. (still with a lower overall average than anything post 2000’s, but whatever)Era. It was a high scoring era where 70% of matches were drawn. Almost no great bowlers. Barrington was never seen as a great in his time
average in the matches Barrington played – 31.85Yea people think Barrington and Boycott played in hard eras when the opposite is likely true
I still think Barrington is a great though
Looked at that list, and while I do consider Barrington ATG, the quality of batting in that era really seems quite down. Sobers, Barrington, Kanhai and Boycott; only 4 makes my Top 50...... Can count Simpson in the group at most.He may have played in a relatively high scoring era. (still with a lower overall average than anything post 2000’s, but whatever)
He was by far the best bat during his career, excluding Sobers, who nobody is comparing him to.
![]()
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com
Barrington>Williamson is quite accepted around here.average in the matches Barrington played – 31.85
averages in the matches say Kane Williamson played – 31.91
it's not that bad
Neh23.65 + 26.74 = 50.39
58.67 > 50.39
Simple maths
people get excited about him today because of his average but he just wasn’t seen as top tier in his era. Partly because he was a particularly dour batsmen in a time when test cricket was excruciatingly boringHe may have played in a relatively high scoring era. (still with a lower overall average than anything post 2000’s, but whatever)
He was by far the best bat during his career, excluding Sobers, who nobody is comparing him to.
![]()
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com
bow many of these names would you consider ATGs. Davidson maybe,I wouldnt say he didn’t face quality bowlers either. Just some names off the top of my head.
Davidson, Benaud, Gibbs, Hall, Tayfield, Pollock, Adcock, Bedi, Chandra, Prasanna.