PlayerComparisons
International Captain
.
Think make someone so is the goal here.....piss off
making**Think make someone so is the goal here.....
Worked.making**
What if they're wrong?Barry Richards has been named by multiple test players and pundits as the best batsman they've ever seen, he's obviously made quite a few AT XI's and cricinfo's and Martin Crowe's second teams.
Best batsman in the world for more than a half decade and Bradman rates him on the same plane as Hobbs and Hutton.
He could and have consistently done things no other opener can, and was a first rate slip fielder.
Not many players are beating that quality or resume, certainly not Kapil.
If one wants to say he had a better test career, then sure, better cricketer? Not a chance.
You aren't comparing an illustrious career with a good career here. You are comparing an illustrious career with a nothing career. Kapil took almost as many wickets as the runs Barry scored.Barry Richards has been named by multiple test players and pundits as the best batsman they've ever seen, he's obviously made quite a few AT XI's and cricinfo's and Martin Crowe's second teams.
Best batsman in the world for more than a half decade and Bradman rates him on the same plane as Hobbs and Hutton.
He could and have consistently done things no other opener can, and was a first rate slip fielder.
Not many players are beating that quality or resume, certainly not Kapil.
If one wants to say he had a better test career, then sure, better cricketer? Not a chance.
All of them?What if they're wrong?
It's not impossible. Gavaskar got 12 votes in the Wisden's five cricketers of the century, all of them were wrong.All of them?
Right or wrong.What if they're wrong?
LmaoIt's not impossible. Gavaskar got 12 votes in the Wisden's five cricketers of the century, all of them were wrong.
He really wasn't though.Right or wrong.
He was unproven at the highest level in cricket.
By highest level, he means Test cricket.He really wasn't though.
There's a reason he makes AT teams.
But I'm not trying to relitigate.
Come on.@kyear2 Why do you like him so much?
It's not impossible. Gavaskar got 12 votes in the Wisden's five cricketers of the century, all of them were wrong.
He's one of one with regards to his skill set. He had an excellent technique, and could consistently take apart the very best pacers on helpful tracks. There's isn't another opener that we've seen who can do that.@kyear2 Why do you like him so much?