• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Kagiso Rabada vs Keith Miller

Who is the better test bowler?

  • Total voters
    13
Johan

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Miller is superior on quality but simply does not bowl the overs needed for him to beat specialists.
 
shortpitched713

shortpitched713

Cricketer Of The Year
I don't see how Rabada is possibly worse than Miller unless he has a steep, steep late career decline.

Miller simply didn't have the bowling workload to compete with specialists in his general bowling average vicinity.
 
Coronis

Coronis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
shortpitched713 said:
I don't see how Rabada is possibly worse than Miller unless he has a steep, steep late career decline.

Miller simply didn't have the bowling workload to compete with specialists in his general bowling average vicinity.
Click to expand...
Not a great argument in this case, since Miller bowled more overs per match and innings than Rabada does.

I’d probably go with the 22 SR difference as an argument.
 
shortpitched713

shortpitched713

Cricketer Of The Year
Coronis said:
Not a great argument in this case, since Miller bowled more overs per match and innings than Rabada does.

I’d probably go with the 22 SR difference as an argument.
Click to expand...
WPI, if I'm being more honest, although SR difference is notable too. Miller never really had the kind of impact Rabada does.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top