• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Is ODI Cricket Losing Its Relevance?

Is ODI Cricket Losing Its Relevance?

  • Yes

    Votes: 13 81.3%
  • No

    Votes: 3 18.8%

  • Total voters
    16

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The loss of tours that would include an ODI and a test series hasn't helped as all the ODI series now seem to happen at random. Playing 3 ODIs before a home Ashes series felt like a good appetiser. However, as @Chin Music says we then had overkill as series extended to 7 matches, often at the end of tours, that just dragged on. Then standalone 7 match series etc.

I'm still an advocate that for tours that are less high profile, the women's approach of having multi-format scoring to decide the series winners should be used.
Peak ODIs outside World Cups were the tri-series IMO. If we're talking in England, the NatWest series' before the Ashes in 2001 and 2005 were great fun, better than a meaningless 3 game series. And it was always very popular in Australia every year for a couple decades (even if the neutral games didn't always get a good crowd).

The late 90s/early 00s might have gone overboard a bit with the Sharjah tournaments but in moderation that was what ODI cricket was all about for me growing up
 

Top