Harbhajan's 2001 BGT vs Warne's 2005 Ashes

[MasterBlaster24]

Which was better?

Harbhajan in 2001: 32 wickets at an average of 17.03(6 inns)

Warne in 2005: 40 wickets at an average of 19.93(10 inns)

 

[SillyCowCorner1]

Warne. Added valuable runs as well

 

[capt_Luffy]

Harbhajan single handedly bowled India to both those wins

 

[Cricket Bliss]

Warne.

Harbajan did it on dustbowl home conditions whereas Warne did it on least spin friendly conditions.

And for singlehandedly winning for Harbajan, that is great… but you can’t win single handedly if you have a person like McGrath in your team!

 

[OverratedSanity]

If it's on bowling alone, I'd go with Bhajji. Never forget India's second highest wicket-taker that series was Sachin with 3 wickets.