• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Dravid vs Pietersen, who was better against high quality bowling?

Who was the better batsman against high quality bowling?


  • Total voters
    22

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
KP. Much more likely to do well against a bowling lineup of McGrath, Steyn, Warne and Murali.
 

ma1978

International Debutant
KP. Much more likely to do well against a bowling lineup of McGrath, Steyn, Warne and Murali.
That's like saying I am going to have a chance to have a foursome with Aishwarya Rai, Megan Fox, etc, etc. it’s a ridiculous scenario
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
People think saying a player being worse against high quality bowling makes them a worse bat. Not true. You also need consistency aside from that against mid and low attacks which KP lacks.
 

PlayerComparisons

International Captain
People think saying a player being worse against high quality bowling makes them a worse bat. Not true. You also need consistency aside from that against mid and low attacks which KP lacks.
Yeah dravid was one of the best ever against low quality bowling but he was underwhelming against high quality bowling a bit like Inzi/Root
 

Top