subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Generally speaking, which has had more impact on batting records?
Would a bat rather face a top attack on a batting friendly wicket or a mid attack on a sporting wicket?realistically, pitches by far.
depends on what you mean by sporting. If the wicket is underprepared, wet, matting, extremely dusty or cracking then you'd much rather face the top attack on a flat pitch, as on prior even the average bowlers would've their output amplified to ATG levels.Would a bat rather face a top attack on a batting friendly wicket or a mid attack on a sporting wicket?
No not a lottery pitch. More like typical result oriented Eng 80s wicket or Indian 90s wicket.depends on what you mean by sporting. If the wicket is underprepared, wet, matting, extremely dusty or cracking then you'd much rather face the top attack on a flat pitch, as on prior even the average bowlers would've their output amplified to ATG levels.
and what level of bowling attack? one or two ATG pacemen + average/above average bowlers? if that's the case, I think most would still perform better against modern Australia on roads than against 90s India on turners.No not a lottery pitch. More like typical result oriented Eng 80s wicket or Indian 90s wicket.
Two worldclass pacers yeah.and what level of bowling attack? one or two ATG pacemen + average/above average bowlers? if that's the case, I think most would still perform better against modern Australia on roads than against 90s India on turners.
The former. If a batsman can get consistent pace and bounce he'd back his chances even against good bowlers. Whereas even Michael Clarke can be a world beater on a bad wicket.Would a bat rather face a top attack on a batting friendly wicket or a mid attack on a sporting wicket?
ATG attack on sticky wickets sounds better.Would a bat rather face a top attack on a batting friendly wicket or a mid attack on a sporting wicket?