11 Bradmans vs 11 Jadejas

[PlayerComparisons]

Which team would win in a test match?

 

[Johan]

Neither, 11 Bradmans would bat forever.

 

[Patience and Accuracy+Gut]

22 Bradman aren’t getting knocked over. You need to dismiss Bradman 20 times in a single game to win the Test. lol. That’s not happening!!

 

[ataraxia]

Key is that Bradman bowled leggies rather than offies. So he's got something of a chance at getting wickets in a timeless match.

The Bradmans are also very good at effecting run outs -- and imagine 11 Jadejas selling their partners down the river!

 

[Johan]

honestly a higher probability of the Bradmans getting Jadeja all out than the other way around tbh

 

[DrWolverine]

22 Bradman

 

[ankitj]

Key is that Bradman bowled leggies rather than offies. So he's got something of a chance at getting wickets in a timeless match.

The Bradmans are also very good at effecting run outs -- and imagine 11 Jadejas selling their partners down the river!

You are overthinking. Answer is always Jadeja

 

[Line and Length]

I have seen some ridiculous comparisons but this takes the cake. @PlayerComparisons where do you come up with these ideas?

 

[Johan]

I have seen some ridiculous comparisons but this takes the cake. @PlayerComparisons where do you come up with these ideas?

Cocaine's a hell of a drug.

 

[Coronis]

honestly a higher probability of the Bradmans getting Jadeja all out than the other way around tbh

Bradman did get out Hammond. Best batsman Jadeja could ever manage was Smith.

 

[Red_Ink_Squid]

Yet another thread where the answer is 11 Jadejas.

 

[ataraxia]

I have seen some ridiculous comparisons but this takes the cake. @PlayerComparisons where do you come up with these ideas?

This is actually the best thread in this subforum in the last month.

 

[Coronis]

This is actually the best thread in this subforum in the last month.

Is it just because its a break from two posters talking about certain players over and over? Or cause you like the unserious stuff?

 

[ataraxia]

Is it just because its a break from two posters talking about certain players over and over? Or cause you like the unserious stuff?

Definitely the former, but also because it's an interesting question. It's a much more reliable way to determine people's actual thoughts about cricket than a vague player comparison with votes tainted by bias.

 

[subshakerz]

Whoever gets less bored.

 

[Coronis]

Whoever gets less bored.

That would be Bradman. Immense amount of concentration and determination to crush opponents.

 

[sayon basak]

Don't think 11 Bradmans will get along with each other.

 

[Coronis]

Don't think 11 Bradmans will get along with each other.

I’m the real Bradman.

No, I am.

Jessie to be team manager. She convinced him to play after WWII, she can get them to get along.

 

[capt_Luffy]

I’m the real Bradman.

No, I am.

Jessie to be team manager. She convinced him to play after WWII, she can get them to get along.

If there aren't 11 Jessies I can see a significantly bigger problem happening......