• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Search results

  1. C

    *Official* Second Test (Lord's, London) 28 June–2 July

    The rational consequence of the Starc non-catch, would be for the deciding umpire NEVER to make his decision until he sees the video replay of the potential wicket. Can you imagine the crowd reaction?
  2. C

    *Official* Second Test (Lord's, London) 28 June–2 July

    Then it seems that it was solely the existence of and timing of the replay being shown on the screen that instigated the review. That means that the TV broadcast is now an integral part of the game not just a tool for umpiring. If the video of the catch was not shown until Druckett had left the...
  3. C

    *Official* Second Test (Lord's, London) 28 June–2 July

    While this may not be the correct place to pose this question.... regarding the Mitch Starc catch....I did not see any 'appeal' by the Australians. I saw Druckett walk.I saw Stokes talking to the Umpire. What was the decision that the field umpire referred referred to the third umpire? Do the...

Top