• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Recent content by octobertiger

  1. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    oops nope, was way wide of the mark. all i know it crashes when you mess with it. I rec its telling the game where the player fits in with other files. I doubt its of crucial importance, as regards to making an editor.
  2. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    Guys, May have worked out what that first unknown offset is. Am beginning to test it properly now. Will confirm when i'm 100% sure.
  3. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    Hewo everyone. Long time no grrrrrrr! Tayyab - if you go back to around page 7 and start looking from there, you will find a lot of info concerning batting and allrounders. Get a pen and paper and mess around for a bit, you'll get the hang of it. It took me a little while once I got switched...
  4. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    Not quite, meester bond (strokes white cat) Bangladesh D0 Scotland B0 :cool2:
  5. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    That shocked me. Norway are going to be a serious threat! :P This might/might not help: flintoff lan E6 00 01 80 08 E6 00 chapple lan BA 00 01 80 08 BA 00 hegg lan 04 01 01 80 08 04 01 penney war 5E 01 01 80 10 5E 01 n warren war 7A 00 01 80 10 7A 00...
  6. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    Hi guys. Posts are interesting. It seems that people are setting out to totally crack everything there is to crack about the game. Very ambitious! "Magpie" Editor looks kewl. Am impressed. Would be more impressed if it was tiger-striped and everytime you selected an option it went "grrrrrrrr"...
  7. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    Morning peeps, Didn't get a chance to look in yesterday but am excited about the new developments. Will have a look in later this evening, unless I get sacked. Could happen as manageress has turned into psycho b****. Anyways, later :cool2:
  8. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    OK thats fab, but whats the second digit of the eleventh offset do? Another skill moderator??
  9. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    Oh the pain and suffering that ofsted's cause! I have looked into county allegiance, and am pretty sure that the unknown areas around salary and contracts aren't them...will look again, hopefully on Friday. If it isn't solved by then! I just boosted Pollock's stats and he starred in his first...
  10. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    yeah i remember it being written now. ta. everything practically must be covered. So what offsets are left? I keep calling them offsteds. Bloody teaching. i'm going to turn the warwickshire team into a bunch of demi-gods and will see what happens. might give some players the crazy 8 and...
  11. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    Kings Lynn v Exeter? Deery me. Is Steve Flack still up front for you lot? Anyways...Hick's average altered little when I changed the 0 to 8 and back again. Then I played yet again with 0 and he got an average of 70+ over the 7 summer tests. So - its a hard thing to test. I have no stomach for...
  12. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    I changed Thorpe's 8 to an 0. His average in the 7 test matches changed from 39 to 19. Am about to change Hick's from 0 to 8. Mindset? Perhaps. But don't batsmen's preferences cover this anyway? Unless its a mental toughness stat or summat. I still think 8=more chance of having a test career...
  13. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    Back to Offset 7. A Flower 8 R Dravid 8 A Gilchrist 8 M Hayden 8 C Gayle 8 S Katich 8 J Langer 8 M Waugh 8 S Waugh 8 M Ramprakash 0 C Taylor 0 T Taibu 0 L Vincent 0 S Lee 0 M Bevan 0 (not a star at test cricket, unf) D Lehmann 0 H Bashir and a lot of Bangladeshi players 0 .....I think I...
  14. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    I'm not sure I agree that offset 13 is for just "economy rate" If you scroll down the column, you will see that Ian Bell (him again!) has the highest rate of all. Yet I use him regularly as a 4th/5th bowler, and he is very successful, picking up two or three wickets most innings. His economy...
  15. O

    *Official* ICC2002 Editing Developments

    That's kewl but, going back on the topic, I cannot accept that in the batting offset, 0 means the same as 8. Everything is for a reason, right? It's interesting that, in the table, Vaughan, Butcher, Hussain, Thorpe and Stewart have 8s - and they are seen as more recognised test batsmen than...
See more

Top