@Thala_0710
I don't know if you're trolling or not but this is just plain stupidity. When you're discussing how good someone is a player of spin, it doesn't matter how well you're doing against spin specifically?? So you're basically saying if one's averaging is reducing in Asia due to getting out to pace, he is a worse player of spin. Like that's obviously stupid. If you want to say that Williamson is better in home conditions overall than those two then yeah it makes sense. Not vs spin or pace specifically.
The problem of your formula is it doesn't take team composition into account, when a Batsman is playing a great innings the probability of their dismissal to a pacer is exponentially higher because teams come with 4 pacers and 1 spinner, and sometimes all seamers. If a Batsman is to be dismissed by a mistake after making a big hundred against a strong unit, the mistake has a 4/5 probability of coming against a paceman, on top the number of high quality pacers has been exponentially higher than high quality spinners since the 1980s, so majority of dismissals naturally come against them, just a higher proportion of them and generally higher quality. You can't just take a dude's pace average and then compare it to a dude's spin average. ****ing, HARRY BROOK AVERAGES HIGHER AGAINST SPIN THAN KANE DOES AGAINST PACE BALL BY BALL, It might as well just be impossible to directly compare spin and pace averages.
Refer to the old wisdom, and you go by credentials and the facts are as follows.
1. Kane has averaged 72 in New Zealand since turning 23 year old, Mahela averaged 57 in Sri Lanka, Sehwag averaged 54 in India.
2. Sehwag has away credentials against spin in Sri Lanka, Kane doesn't have away credentials against pace, Mahela doesn't have away credentials against spin.
3. Sehwag never made a hundred in the second half of a Test match in Asia and the average becomes 30, Kane dominates in the first half that's generally bowler dominant with a 65 batting average and then 84.
He doesn't. He's great at home, ofc he is. Sometimes they do produce tough pitches at home like you said, and he has done well. But he hasn't dominated consistently on them, especially away. That's an enormous exaggeration.
Mate, his 251 came against an all pace attack on such a green pitch that you couldn't even tell it from the outfield! he hasn't gotten opportunities overseas, in what he has gotten he has done well in Australia and failed in England but it's unquestionable that Kane dominates on all kinds of spicy pitches at home, same way Sehwag and Mahela dominated on turners and got credit for it.
I don't think Williamson is their equal. He's better than them. But he is in the same mould of player as them, and no it's not hate. Just because someone is putting up proper arguments against someone, doesn't make them a hater. You're better than this luffy, come on.
The comment was a bit tongue in cheek, but It's generally just annoying that you're pretending 2 and 3 matches in India and South Africa respectively define him when he has so, so much more.
