subshakerz
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Three greatest ODI pace bowlers. What is your ranking of them?
My issue with him is career sample size. McGrath just did it in a tougher era and both Wasim and he did it for a much longer time.Garner is the GOAT ODI bowler
1. Garner
2. McGrath
3. Wasim
I don't see why it's hard.Always find it to separate McGrath and Garner in odis... McGrath > Garner just...
Wasim is close but a clear third for me
Even if you account for the tougher era, Garner's stats are still better actually... The longevity and brilliant WC record is why I have McGrath just over GarnerI don't see why it's hard.
McGrath tougher era plus longevity
Sure but he was exceptional.but in an era of easy ODI bowling and many getting worldclass figures.Even if you account for the tougher era, Garner's stats are still better actually... The longevity and brilliant WC record is why I have McGrath just over Garner
Yeah but the point is he still stood out from everyone else... It's like someone averaging 60+ in tests in the 2000s or early 2010s...like Steve Smith wasSure but he was exceptional.but in an era of easy ODI bowling and many getting worldclass figures.
I think it was easier to stand out in that era with ODIs in their infancy.Yeah but the point is he still stood out from everyone else... It's like someone averaging 60+ in tests in the 2000s or early 2010s...like Steve Smith was
I agree with that point definitely, especially with not many teams taking it super seriously either... Like they were from 90s-2010sI think it was easier to stand out in that era with ODIs in their infancy.
Yeah. We could use this point against Viv too but he still deserves credit for being a trailblazer and ODI bowling quality was still quite good.I agree with that point definitely, especially with not many teams taking it super seriously either... Like they were from 90s-2010s
I do use this against Viv too, but both him and Garner are exceptional either way thoughYeah. We could use this point against Viv too but he still deserves credit for being a trailblazer and ODI bowling quality was still quite good.
Also you had bats like Gavsaskar and Boycott clearly not suited to the game and less consensus on how to bat properly. Fairly easier to be restrictive in that environmentI agree with that point definitely, especially with not many teams taking it super seriously either... Like they were from 90s-2010s
Agree more so on Boycott.... Gavaskar actually got quite decent by the time he really took it seriously... In 1987 (his retirement year) he smashed what was the second fastest ODI ton ever at that time...Also you had bats like Gavsaskar and Boycott clearly not suited to the game and less consensus on how to bat properly. Fairly easier to be restrictive in that environment
Yeah it had advanced by that point with the 87 WC but Garner was gone I think.Agree more so on Boycott.... Gavaskar actually got quite decent by the time he really took it seriously... In 1987 (his retirement year) he smashed what was the second fastest ODI ton ever at that time...
Gavaskar's stats aren't actually bad for his Era. His SR is the same as Greenidge and Haynes and averages 35 IIRC. The 36* was really an anomaly, at a time no one had a proper idea what the ODIs actually were.Agree more so on Boycott.... Gavaskar actually got quite decent by the time he really took it seriously... In 1987 (his retirement year) he smashed what was the second fastest ODI ton ever at that time...
Yup, all of that.... Which reminds me..... Odi XIs next after the World XIs are done?Gavaskar's stats aren't actually bad for his Era. His SR is the same as Greenidge and Haynes and averages 35 IIRC. The 36* was really an anomaly, at a time no one had a proper idea what the ODIs actually were.