• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Kapil/Jadeja vs Botham/Flintoff

Better AR pair


  • Total voters
    23

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
and you can say the same about batting. Jadeja is selected for batting alone anywhere in the world. Botham is selected nowhere in the world.
Then why was Jadeja dropped while India had a struggling middler order overseas?

Because he wasn't good enough until only recent years.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
In most cases, yes, but there will always be outliers. Botham's tons, and more importantly, his game defining tons, are something Jadeja lacks in his batting resume.
Plus Jadeja has a NO boost, around 1/5th of his innings. An advantage Botham doesn't have.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
argue the numbers rather than your intuition. Jadeja’s a batter batter and it’s not that close
we established none of that in the Imran discussion, Botham has 3× more hundreds in 25% more innings, makes more run per innings and has more match winning performances with the bat by far. It's clear who is better with the bat. Jadeja being a better bat and not that close is clear blind average reading.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
not ours are meaningless, we established that when discussing imran

argue the numbers rather than your intuition. Jadeja’s a batter batter and it’s not that close
No they aren't. It is a slight average boost and Botham if he batted at 7/8 would also have many NOs. I have accepted that with Imran.
 

ma1978

International Regular
No they aren't. It is a slight average boost and Botham if he batted at 7/8 would also have many NOs. I have accepted that with Imran.
wasn’t aware 15% is slight. It’s the difference between someone averaging 45 and 52.

also home / away split is massive. Jadeja better outside India

also Botham averaging 14 in the West Indies
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
we established none of that in the Imran discussion, Botham has 3× more hundreds in 25% more innings, makes more run per innings and has more match winning performances with the bat by far. It's clear who is better with the bat. Jadeja being a better bat and not that close is clear blind average reading.
Yes. I have to say I'm finding this conversation bizarre. There is hardly much difference between Imran and Jadeja while clear advantages for Botham. It's kinda disheartening how some folk simply don't know basics of how to judge bats.

Botham had the expectations of a middle order bat his entire career and corresponding output. Jadeja simply does not and I can guarantee you almost nobody here arguing for him would put him in their Indian top 6 until only recently.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
wasn’t aware 15% is slight. It’s the difference between someone averaging 45 and 52.

also home / away split is massive. Jadeja better outside India

also Botham averaging 14 in the West Indies
Jadeja is basically 20 percent not outs, not 15.

Jadeja is a far inferior away bowler which is his primary skill.

The only reason his overall figures look so nice is because his homebase is in India, if he debuted for NZ he may not even have a career his bowling would be that neutered.

As for batting, again, Botham was clearly a frontline bat, Jadeja is only recently that and you all are getting excited.
 

ma1978

International Regular
we established none of that in the Imran discussion, Botham has 3× more hundreds in 25% more innings, makes more run per innings and has more match winning performances with the bat by far. It's clear who is better with the bat. Jadeja being a better bat and not that close is clear blind average reading.
can debate more match winning performances

centuries are arbitrary. Jadeja has 32 scores past 50 in 128 innings (25%). Botham has 36 scores past fifty in 161 innings (22%)

and then the consistency abroad and the West Indies issue w Botham

Can’t see the argument for Botham
 

ma1978

International Regular
Jadeja is basically 20 percent not outs, not 15.

Jadeja is a far inferior away bowler which is his primary skill.

The only reason his overall figures look so nice is because his homebase is in India, if he debuted for NZ he may not even have a career his bowling would be that neutered.

As for batting, again, Botham was clearly a frontline bat, Jadeja is only recently that and you all are getting excited.
He may been a frontline bat for longer but clearly a worse bat
 

ImpatientLime

International Regular
and you can say the same about batting. Jadeja is selected for batting alone anywhere in the world. Botham is selected nowhere in the world.
i mean he's clearly not selected anywhere in the world for his batting alone given the amount of times he's been asked to ride the bench away from home.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
can debate more match winning performances

centuries are arbitrary. Jadeja has 32 scores past 50 in 128 innings (25%). Botham has 36 scores past fifty in 161 innings (22%)

and then the consistency abroad and the West Indies issue w Botham

Can’t see the argument for Botham
Ah yes as we know fifties are really the best match winning metric.
 

Top