Those 2 wins were against NZ. I'm only discussing results vs the 4 test quality sides. Zim's win rate would also look a lot better if the proportion of sub-standard teams floating around was the same. They have 5 wins with Bangers included.
Zimbabwe lost around half of their games, Pakistan around one forth. That's a pretty big factor personally.
arguable. Umrigar was the better batsman, and a handy off spinner as well.
Pataudi was India's Best Captain, a World Class fielder and arguably better batsman in Tests
That's fair. There are counter points to this. Zim only played 1 poor team. They won all the series against them. Pak lost and drew series vs weaker opposition. And Zim actually beat quality opposition.
Pakistan drew 2 Series to each of England and Australia.
Yes, there are reasons to rate them above Zim. I'm fine with it if you do. You should also be able to see the point behind not rating a team that went a decade without a win against quality opposition.
I think Umrigar was clearly the better bat
Tiger did so much better against Australia and England though.
You just acknowledged me as a genius. You should just blindly agree with my takes from now on.
There is zero argument
Hey, I never said I don't consider myself a Genius as well!!! My self worth keeps constantly oscillating between being a clueless hack and an absolute Genius who just doesn't gives a ****
Not a crazy take
It's crazy as hell brother
Stop coping at the fact that England's best pacer since Barnes is Anderson and live your life.
this is just completely and utterly insane. Anderson is not fit to tie Freddie's laces.
Depends if you’re talking top 15 bowlers or pacers
At least Trueman will still get to play after Thala drops his top 15 pacers and batsmen.
