It also applies the other way round, and to a greater extent because the modern pairing is more effective.Yeah that is the point why Kumble/Harbi are going to be difficult for Kohli's team to handle in these conditions. That's all.
It also applies the other way round, and to a greater extent because the modern pairing is more effective.Yeah that is the point why Kumble/Harbi are going to be difficult for Kohli's team to handle in these conditions. That's all.
Everyone's batting averages would be better lol. Still being braindead about this.Do you mean would Jadeja's batting average be better in the 2000s? Obviously it would.
Because of the pitches and if you switched decades for Kumble/Harbi and Ashwin/Jadeja, the former would be more effective.It also applies the other way round, and to a greater extent because the modern pairing is more effective.
I don't.You ignore it for the batting though, lol. Can't pick and choose like a bozo.
Not really? You haven't shown that to be the case, and it's not like anyone here feels Harbhajan was as good as you wished for him to be for such idiotic discussions.Because of the pitches and if you switched decades for Kumble/Harbi and Ashwin/Jadeja, the former would be more effective.
I never denied that. Kohli's team still wouldn't be as a strong batting-wise though even with an average boost.Everyone's batting averages would be better lol.
You're not subshakerz, unless this is an alt reveal.I don't.
That's debatable, especially when the hindsight bias is very strong already.I never denied that. Kohli's team still wouldn't as a strong batting-wise though even with an average boost.
Given many examples of average spinners the past decade reaping the wind on these pitches against Kohli's team, and Harbi is better than them, except Lyon.Not really? You haven't shown that to be the case, and it's not like anyone here feels Harbhajan was as good as you wished for him to be for such idiotic discussions.
That's all your opinion, you haven't proven **** apart from being hopeless here.Given many examples of average spinners the past decade reaping the wind on these pitches against Kohli's team, and Harbi is better than them, except Lyon.
I showed you the stats. It's all official record.That's all your opinion, you haven't proven **** apart from being hopeless here.
You just gave the records of the bowlers who played in that era. You didn't do anything with it though so stop lying please.I showed you the stats. It's all official record.
I didn't. I gave the key series hauls of visiting spinners to show how relatively easier taking cheap wickets was there.You just gave the records of the bowlers who played in that era. You didn't do anything with it though so stop lying please.
Jadeja will average in teens on pitches that Harbi averages 25.Harbi would be averaging sub 25 with the ball at home this past decade. In fact, almost any reasonable spinner would.
So we agree it's the pitches thanks.Jadeja will average in teens on pitches that Harbi averages 25.
Keep dreaming.Yeah but give him an entire career on those pitches and watch his average keep dropping.
Because we watched him bowl absolute trash for the second half of his career. The dude put more revolutions on his turban than on the ****ing ball.Yikes. I never get the Harbi hate by some Indian posters on this forum.
I would take the vast majority over the spinners over the actual Harbhajan's bowling in the last part of his career. He was properly bad.Given many examples of average spinners the past decade reaping the wind on these pitches against Kohli's team, and Harbi is better than them, except Lyon.
No. We agree Harbi is much worse than Jadeja and Ashwin.So we agree it's the pitches thanks.
That was the time he bowled India to victories in SL, WI, SA and NZ though.Because we watched him bowl absolute trash for the second half of his career. The dude put more revolutions on his turban than on the ****ing ball.