Ya, could be considered strong as 6 or 7 have played in the National Team alreadymasterblaster said:India 'A', Australia 'A' and Pakistan 'A' would no doubt be the strongest of teams and it would be out of those three really to win a tournament of 'A' teams.
England 'A' comes very close too, they have a fine crop of youngsters. Im not too sure about South Africa 'A', New Zealand 'A' or West Indies 'A'.
India 'A' is something like
Gautam Gambhir
Sridharan Sriram
Dinesh Mongia
Hemang Badani
Rohan Gavaskar
JP Yadav/Reetinder Sodhi
Ajay Ratra/Dinesh Karthik
Amit Mishra
Siddharth Trivedi
Munaf Patel
Aavishkar Salvi
Sarandeep Singh
Mr. Ponting said:India A is exceptionally stong and would JUST pip Australia A. Good contest though
That was just for the one dayers they played, the 4 day games are chosen on merit and I dare say if there was an A WC then players like Blewett, Bichel, Elliott, Hodge, etc would be chosen.Waughney said:Australia A is more of an Australian under 26 team (except Secombe), the side is chosen to give young players experience and so wouldn't exactly be an 'A' team. Other A sides don't get much coverage so I don't know who'd win but I'll just say Australia anyway
You haven't got any of the 2 in the XIbrockley said:Oops meant cameron white,he seems a better prospect than hauritz at the mo haurie lost form,white also adds to the batting.
cameron watson = cameron whiteWaughney said:You haven't got any of the 2 in the XI
I Think u just forget to add MICHAEL CLARKE'S Name in the teambrockley said:Australia A has an 80% winning rate against international touring sides,so i'd say australia A head and shoulders above the rest.
Team:
jimmy maher
marcus north
brad hodge
simon katich ( as he not in the onedayers)
mike hussey
russell campbell
shane watson
cameron watson
damien wright
nathan brakken
shaun tait
12th man ashley noffke.
This side would beat many international teams .