Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-11-2006, 03:54 AM   #106 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Arjun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 7,837
What are your comments on Lou Vincent wicketkeeping? He can then bat in the middle-order, and given complaints about Scott Styris, they can drop him and promote Vettori to Number Eight and Jacob Oram can be your Number Seven/stock seamer, followed by three bowlers. There's something to think about: what do you do when you've got as many as four bowlers who are more than useful batsmen for their FC teams?
__________________
"Talent is nothing without opportunity"
"You're not remembered for aiming at the target, but hitting it"

Twenty20 used to be boring.

Sponsored...by...nothing!!!

Last edited by Arjun; 02-11-2006 at 05:33 AM.
Arjun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 03:57 AM   #107 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
_Ed_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Auckland, Aotearoa
Posts: 19,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macka
Completely disagree. Styris takes a long time to get in, and he looks pretty average until he does. He's prone to jabbing at the ball outside of off early in his innings.

Although he does have a few hundreds batting at 3...

Nah. Bad idea in my opinion.
Fair enough. His best test innings though (and one of the best innings I've seen by a New Zealand batsman) of 170 against SA started with NZ at 4-2, and I thought it was a perfect display of top-order batting against a very tough new-ball attack.
_Ed_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 04:21 AM   #108 (permalink)
International Captain
 
Loony BoB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Edinburgh (although I'm a New Zealander)
Posts: 7,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Ed_
Fair enough. His best test innings though (and one of the best innings I've seen by a New Zealand batsman) of 170 against SA started with NZ at 4-2, and I thought it was a perfect display of top-order batting against a very tough new-ball attack.
Styris bats at #3 best - averaging 142 over four innings and never once out for less than 100 against the likes of India, South Africa and England.

My ideal side would be...

Fleming
Papps
Styris
Vincent
Astle
Oram
Vettori
McCullum
Franklin
Gillespie / Patel
Bond

Yes, Fleming suffered when opening against Australia. But who doesn't?
__________________
REMEMBER: A couple of years in therapy, you'll get over it.

Proud to be a member of the CW Colts

Loony BoB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 04:28 AM   #109 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
NZTailender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
Posts: 19,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loony BoB
Yes, Fleming suffered when opening against Australia. But who doesn't?

Yeah, true that. Averaged 40 in that position against England and the other match (aside from Australia) he was not out 69. Could be worth a shot in this home series.
__________________
President of SKAS - Kat is King | Proud member of CVAAS - One of the best | LRPLTAS - Rosco rocks!
The NZTailender Supporting XI:
L Vincent, H Rutherford, N Broom, Craig Cachopa, D Brownlie, BJ Watling, D de Boorder+, I Sodhi, B Wheeler, H Bennett, A Milne
Go Tigers!
R.I.P. Fardin & Craig
NZTailender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 04:48 AM   #110 (permalink)
State Vice-Captain
 
Retox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,317
We either play how/papps and make them open (drop marshall + astle)
or play one of them (papps for me) and have McCullum open Marshall/Fulton if they are to play need to bat in the middle order.


EDIT: Whats everyones thoughts on Oram in the ODI team now? any stats for this ICC Champs for him?
__________________
No'ones gonna take me alive
The time has come to make things right
You and I must fight for our rights
You and I must fight to survive

New Zealand Cricket Supporter

Last edited by Retox; 02-11-2006 at 04:54 AM.
Retox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 05:30 AM   #111 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
_Ed_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Auckland, Aotearoa
Posts: 19,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjun
What are yoru comments on Lou Vincent wicketkeeping? He can then bat in the middle-order, and given complaints about Scott Styris, they can drop him and promote Vettori to Number Eight and Jacob Oram can be your Number Seven/stock seamer, followed by three bowlers. There's something to think about: what do you do when you've got as many as four bowlers who are more than useful batsmen for their FC teams?
I think it'd be pretty ridiculous to drop McCullum. That's just my opinion though of course.
_Ed_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 05:32 AM   #112 (permalink)
International Captain
 
Loony BoB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Edinburgh (although I'm a New Zealander)
Posts: 7,269
Completely agree that there's no reason to drop McCullum and I don't think we'll benefit from it at all.

EDIT: I've always thought Oram should be in the ODI side, regardless of how well he bats. He's rated #15 in the world, after all, in that respect.
Loony BoB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 05:35 AM   #113 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Arjun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 7,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loony BoB
Completely agree that there's no reason to drop McCullum and I don't think we'll benefit from it at all.

EDIT: I've always thought Oram should be in the ODI side, regardless of how well he bats. He's rated #15 in the world, after all, in that respect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Ed_
I think it'd be pretty ridiculous to drop McCullum. That's just my opinion though of course.
Then how will you fit Lou Vincent into the team? He's clearly not an opener, and unless you have one of Fleming or Astle or even both opening regularly (we're talking regular openers, not test/ODI specialists), he won't find a place in the team. One may even consider dropping one of the middle-order stalwarts to accommodate Vincent, but it's risky, and it's up to you whether you want to do that.
Arjun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 05:37 AM   #114 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
NZTailender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
Posts: 19,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loony BoB
Completely agree that there's no reason to drop McCullum and I don't think we'll benefit from it at all.

EDIT: I've always thought Oram should be in the ODI side, regardless of how well he bats. He's rated #15 in the world, after all, in that respect.

Yeah, would be foolish to drop McCullum. I'm torn because I think he has the ability to be a quality top order player yet he's vital for us down the order.


Oram is averaging pretty good with the ball regardless of his ODI average, which is somewhat 'ruined' by the fact he comes in in the slog overs. I think he deserves a bit of a promotion, but again, he's valueable to us down the order.
NZTailender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 05:39 AM   #115 (permalink)
International Captain
 
Loony BoB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Edinburgh (although I'm a New Zealander)
Posts: 7,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjun
Then how will you fit Lou Vincent into the team? He's clearly not an opener, and unless you have one of Fleming or Astle or even both opening regularly (we're talking regular openers, not test/ODI specialists), he won't find a place in the team. One may even consider dropping one of the middle-order stalwarts to accommodate Vincent, but it's risky, and it's up to you whether you want to do that.
Easy. Open with Fleming. Or, you know, have some squad rotation going, playing them by form, like they do now. It's not like you have to play the same XI every time. Look at football sides and their midfield - they can't play every player every day, so they quite simply don't.
Loony BoB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 05:42 AM   #116 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
_Ed_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Auckland, Aotearoa
Posts: 19,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjun
Then how will you fit Lou Vincent into the team? He's clearly not an opener, and unless you have one of Fleming or Astle or even both opening regularly (we're talking regular openers, not test/ODI specialists), he won't find a place in the team. One may even consider dropping one of the middle-order stalwarts to accommodate Vincent, but it's risky, and it's up to you whether you want to do that.
That's a good question, but I'd rather leave Vincent out altogether than drop McCullum.
_Ed_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 05:43 AM   #117 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
NZTailender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
Posts: 19,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjun
Then how will you fit Lou Vincent into the team? He's clearly not an opener, and unless you have one of Fleming or Astle or even both opening regularly (we're talking regular openers, not test/ODI specialists), he won't find a place in the team. One may even consider dropping one of the middle-order stalwarts to accommodate Vincent, but it's risky, and it's up to you whether you want to do that.
He's best suited to the number 4 position in tests, IMO. I think Styris holds that spot at the moment?
NZTailender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 05:44 AM   #118 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
NZTailender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
Posts: 19,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Ed_
That's a good question, but I'd rather leave Vincent out altogether than drop McCullum.

I don't know how we got onto the subject of Vincent keeping but I do believe he needs to be in the test side despite his recent ODI failings.

We managed to get him into the side at number 4 the last time Sri Lanka played, and he scored 200 odd. And then he was asked to open in Zimbabwe, IIRC.
NZTailender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 05:49 AM   #119 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Arjun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 7,837
I got the idea of Vincent wicketkeeping because he's often played as a part-time wicketkeeper, just like McCullum before the home series against the Indians.

Anyway, which of the middle-order regulars would you drop? And why? Let's leave out Hamish Marshall for now; we've all decided to keep him out, so we're left with Fleming, Astle and Fulton, who's just made the team.
Arjun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 05:55 AM   #120 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
NZTailender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
Posts: 19,046
Astle will probably retire after the world cup, so that'll make things a lot easier.
NZTailender is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Official Slag Off England Thread Rik Cricket Chat 50 28-10-2006 05:07 PM
The Official English Football Thread Simon General Sports Forum 114 06-09-2006 03:42 PM
Official Squad Confirmation Thread Blewy World Club Cricket 55 02-10-2005 10:28 PM
Black Caps generic thread anzac Cricket Chat 253 08-07-2005 11:55 AM
'Official' Online Thread nibbs General 4 23-01-2002 03:56 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:03 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web