• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Which players you think are not considered all rounders but their stat is like all rounders? (Considering their era )

kohen

Cricket Spectator
I think wasim akram in odi is a good example. Considering his era, i think wasim akram was statistically better all rounder in odi than players like ian botham, shahid afridi.
 
Last edited:

LangleyburyCCPlayer

International Debutant
Paul Collingwood? A part-time bowler in Test cricket, but over 100 wickets in ODIs, perhaps he already is considered an all-rounder in white-ball cricket, but it’s borderline
 

LangleyburyCCPlayer

International Debutant


Two fun pieces (albeit a bit dated) on the best part-time bowlers and best number 8 batters of all time, a lot of Australians are mentioned (and a lot of really good Aussie number 8s were missing!), they seem to do a roaring trade in batters who can bowl and bowlers who can bat without finding someone in the mould of Botham, Stokes, Dev or Jadeja
 

Dazinho

School Boy/Girl Captain
Only after Paul Reiffel retired did I realise what a handy allrounder test record he had.

26.52 with bat and 26.96 with ball
I didn't realise how all-rounder-ish Reiffel was. Knew he was good and the bowling number isn't a shock.

These are the types of player England never seemed to produce, unless Tim Bresnan counts?
 

Ali TT

Cricketer Of The Year
I didn't realise how all-rounder-ish Reiffel was. Knew he was good and the bowling number isn't a shock.

These are the types of player England never seemed to produce, unless Tim Bresnan counts?
Craig White, Giles, Swann, Broad pre-bouncer to the face, Moeen, Wakes, the aforementioned Bresnan...
 

Dazinho

School Boy/Girl Captain
Craig White, Giles, Swann, Broad pre-bouncer to the face, Moeen, Wakes, the aforementioned Bresnan...
Ouch on a few of those since it was compared to Reiffel's record. Woakes is a good shout though, at least in England.

When was the Broady 'bouncer in the face' moment again? It might appear earlier in his career than it actually was, funnily enough Darren Gough's batting followed a similar arc.
 

Ali TT

Cricketer Of The Year
Ouch on a few of those since it was compared to Reiffel's record. Woakes is a good shout though, at least in England.

When was the Broady 'bouncer in the face' moment again? It might appear earlier in his career than it actually was, funnily enough Darren Gough's batting followed a similar arc.
It was 2014 v India. He averaged around 24 with the bat, 30 with the ball.
 

reyrey

State Vice-Captain
I didn't realise how all-rounder-ish Reiffel was. Knew he was good and the bowling number isn't a shock.

These are the types of player England never seemed to produce, unless Tim Bresnan counts?

Before calling him all-rounder-ish it's worth pointing out that Rieffel didn't score any 100s (even at FC level) and his batting average is boosted by a lot of not outs (28%)

England had Dominic Cork in the 90s who was a decent enough bowling all rounder.
 

Molehill

International Coach
Craig White, Giles, Swann, Broad pre-bouncer to the face, Moeen, Wakes, the aforementioned Bresnan...
I think Craig White was only selected because he was an all rounder, and surely Moeen is one of the purest examples of one.

Swann is a good call though, more than useful with the bat (4 FC tons).
 

ankitj

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I think wasim akram in odi is a good example. Considering his era, i think wasim akram was statistically better all rounder in odi than players like ian botham, shahid afridi.
Wasim Akram was a solid big striker down the order. Though played 7 or lower most of the time?
 

Migara

International Coach
And Vaas. He was unceramoniously dropped. Was averaging 35+ with the bat when he was dropped. There was another fast bowler named Ravi Ratnayeke. Was good enough to open the batting. He retired at age of 30 when his batting was truely taking shape. He was pretty bad with the ball on tour but knew exactly what to do on home wickets. SL didn't had much home matches during his era. His batting however was pretty solid.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Ted Dexter? Probably didn't bowl quite enough to properly qualify as an AR (quick calc suggests an average of 14 overs per test) but did manage more wickets than appearances & 34.92 isn't a bad average for a chap bloke whose batting mean is nudging 48.
 

LangleyburyCCPlayer

International Debutant
Ouch on a few of those since it was compared to Reiffel's record. Woakes is a good shout though, at least in England.

When was the Broady 'bouncer in the face' moment again? It might appear earlier in his career than it actually was, funnily enough Darren Gough's batting followed a similar arc.
2014, it no doubt impacted on his batting, but his batting was on the decline by then as he became a more prominent member of the team for his bowling, before then, he would try to bat properly, but after that he would become something of a slogger
 

Coronis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Ted Dexter? Probably didn't bowl quite enough to properly qualify as an AR (quick calc suggests an average of 14 overs per test) but did manage more wickets than appearances & 34.92 isn't a bad average for a chap bloke whose batting mean is nudging 48.
Sounds similar to Hammond
 

Top