• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Viv vs hutton

Who is better

  • Total voters
    26
capt_Luffy

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
subshakerz said:
No. I just think I give aggressive bats more of a qualitative edge, all other factors relatively equal. And Viv was the best in the aggressive category.
Click to expand...
Setting aside I don't agree with that at all, definitely not for an Opener, and don't think being more aggressive is harder, I also wanna point out they have a 6 runs avg difference, and it's mostly a very true difference adjusting for pitch conditions, oppositions, career length et all. Can we really say it's relatively equal? No, imho.
 
subshakerz

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
capt_Luffy said:
Setting aside I don't agree with that at all, definitely not for an Opener, and don't think being more aggressive is harder, I also wanna point out they have a 6 runs avg difference, and it's mostly a very true difference adjusting for pitch conditions, oppositions, career length et all. Can we really say it's relatively equal? No, imho.
Click to expand...
Yes Hutton has slightly better output. That makes it closer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top