DrWolverine
Cricketer Of The Year
Except career; only 3 were ranked less than 15 in all 4 categories(overall, peak, non-home and top opposition)Donald's numbers are quite impressive.
Malcolm Marshall
Allan Donald
Dale Steyn
Except career; only 3 were ranked less than 15 in all 4 categories(overall, peak, non-home and top opposition)Donald's numbers are quite impressive.
Almost as impressive as Rabada.Donald's numbers are quite impressive. Few days back I said that his record maybe slightly light compared to other ATGs. I'm again forced to reconsider my view on that.
I think it's noteworthy that while Donald played for the South Africa XI against the rebel Australians in 1986/87 at the age of 20, he had to wait until 1991/92 to make his Test debut, due to South Africa's isolation.Almost as impressive as Rabada.
On the flip side, it also means he didn’t have those 5 years early in his career where he may not have performed that well whilst still developing as a pace bowler in those early years. We’ll never know.I think it's noteworthy that while Donald played for the South Africa XI against the rebel Australians in 1986/87 at the age of 20, he had to wait until 1991/92 to make his Test debut, due to South Africa's isolation.
In summary, circumstances beyond his control cost him 5 years of Test cricket, with obvious effects on his development and career record.
Thanks mate. I missed your commentary, rants, and bants in these threads.DoGgo, awesome stuff as always. One of the great contributors.
He hit the ground running in 1991 at the age of 25, and was great in Australia in 91/92 and 93/94. So I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.On the flip side, it also means he didn’t have those 5 years early in his career where he may not have performed that well whilst still developing as a pace bowler in those early years. We’ll never know.
Exactly… he hit the ground running at 25. Plenty of the ATG’s had crap records before they were 25. Marshall, McGrath, Hadlee, Imran, Anderson… even Ambrose wasn’t all that hot either. No way of knowing which way he would’ve gone at international level at that age.He hit the ground running in 1991 at the age of 25, and was great in Australia in 91/92 and 93/94. So I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.
Or he could’ve been considered a better Ishant Sharma or a shortened career James Anderson.My guess is Allan Donald would have finished with 400-450 wickets and a much better reputation.