DrWolverine
Cricketer Of The Year
I thought so too but @Pap Finn Keighl was right that Virat did play slower than his teammates except 2019
2015

2011

2019

2023

2015

2011

2019

2023





I mean, was that ever really debated? Think the argument was pretty much he didn't need to have played faster in 2023, the main one. 2015 was mid, 2011 did well as a youngster and 2019 was fine (and struck at team's pace). He never needed to bat faster in 2023, he needed to score. And he did plenty of that. 6 50s and 3 to s in 11 innings (and one fail was against NED with India already through), is as good as they come in my book.I thought so too but @Pap Finn Keighl was right that Virat did play slower than his teammates except 2019
2015
View attachment 53933
2011
View attachment 53934
2019
View attachment 53935
2023
View attachment 53936
What kind of logic is thisI mean, was that ever really debated? Think the argument was pretty much he didn't need to have played faster in 2023, the main one. 2015 was mid, 2011 did well as a youngster and 2019 was fine (and struck at team's pace). He never needed to bat faster in 2023, he needed to score. And he did plenty of that. 6 50s and 3 to s in 11 innings (and one fail was against NED with India already through), is as good as they come in my book.
India scored 400 runs lol. Certainly there was nothing lacking in the batting deptWhat kind of logic is this
Check that 50th century match, Kohli was super slow, Shami's extra ordinary performance saved him.
Except for Kohli.India scored 400 runs lol. Certainly there was nothing lacking in the batting dept
So your main complaint is a ton in the SF when the team score reached almost 400 and the team won by 70 runs? No wonder no one takes you seriously.Except for Kohli.
India didn't score 450 or even 400 thanks to Kohli's ultra slow batting.
India Scored 397 and NZ scored 327 in less than 49 overs despite Shami's extra ordinary 7 wicket performance. No other team in ODI history managed to score even 227 against a 7 wicket performance let alone 327.
Statistically Kohli's 100 was slowest in the history compared to team SR. Mind you..We are not talking about Kallis or Chanders.
And this is his best WC.
You need to clean fungus in your brain, its not working.So your main complaint is a ton in the SF when the team score reached almost 400 and the team won by 70 runs? No wonder no one takes you seriously.
You are just pathetic smh. Kinda not interested to feed trolls todayYou need to clean fungus in your brain, its not working.
1. Batting conditions were super easy
2. NZ scored 327 in less than 49 overs
3. Kohli's scoring rate was pathetic and it was worst century in the history compared to team SR.
4. How did Kohli know Shami would be extra ordinary and going to take 7 wickets to win the match?
To make it simple and easy ( so that there is a tiny chance you will understand it properly ) we'll go with ratios.
Imagine it was in 90s.
If the Team score was 218, Kohli contribution would be 64 runs from 117 balls.
That means
Kohli SR - 56
Rest of the team SR - 82
Had Kohli scored on par with rest of the team, total would have been 246 instead of 218.. Thats a huge difference.
Javagal Srinath strikes fire and takes 6 wickets to finish opponents for 185 in 49 overs doesn't mean 117 ball 64 was good.
Its a Manoj Prabhakarish century.. Not Sachin or deSilva type.
Go celebrate Slowest century in historyYou are just pathetic smh. Kinda not interested to feed trolls today
McGrath had Sehwag 4 times in their 5 tests, for 0, 22, 8 and 5.
Fundamental misunderstanding of cricket. The anchor of the innings is what allows the rest to play with freedom without fear of collapse.So your main complaint is a ton in the SF when the team score reached almost 400 and the team won by 70 runs? No wonder no one takes you seriously.
When everyone else scoring at 82, anchor can score at 72 or even 65. (Even then Anchoring in ODIs is easier and less valuable and a job for less capable guys like Kallis or Dravid ) Scoring at 56 is too slow. ( ratio applied ) there is no excuse for that.Fundamental misunderstanding of cricket. The anchor of the innings is what allows the rest to play with freedom without fear of collapse.
Fungus in the brain line is quality though
Hadlee in tests at this pointTen all-time New Zealand XIs since 1914.
1914 [Tom Reese]: William Barton, Lance Hemus, Jim Baker, Herbert de Maus, Dan Reese*, AB Williams+, Robert Neill, Arthur Fisher, Alec Downes, Ernest Upham, Charlie Frith.
1936 [Tom Reese]: Dempster, Hemus, Hiddleston, Blunt, Dacre, Reese*, AB Williams+, Fisher, Downes, Upham, Frith.
1971 [Brian Croudy]: Sutcliffe, Dempster, Hiddleston, Blunt, Donnelly, JR Reid*, Reese, James+, Brice, Downes, Cowie.
1979 [Cricket Society]: Turner, Dempster, Congdon, Sutcliffe, Donnelly, JR Reid*, Wadsworth+, Hadlee, Motz, Hedley Howarth, Cowie.
1985 [Robin Marlar]: Turner, Dempster, Congdon, Sutcliffe, Donnelly, JR Reid+*, Hadlee, Bruce Taylor, Merritt, Burtt, Cowie.
2009 [Cricinfo]: Turner, Dempster, Sutcliffe, Crowe, Donnelly, JR Reid*, Vettori, Hadlee, Ian Smith+, Bond, Cowie.
2010 [Cricinfo Readers]: Turner, Wright, Fleming*, Crowe, Sutcliffe, Chris Cairns, McCullum+, Vettori, Hadlee, Bond, Cowie.
2014 [Cricket Country]: Sutcliffe, Richardson, Fleming*, Crowe, JF Reid, JR Reid, Watling+, Vettori, Hadlee, Bruce Taylor, Bond.
2024 [The Roar]: Turner, Dempster, Williamson, Crowe, Sutcliffe, JR Reid*, McCullum+, Cairns, Vettori, Hadlee, Cowie.
2025 [Cricket Web]: Turner, Sutcliffe, Williamson*, Crowe, Ross Taylor, Watling+, Cairns, Vettori, Hadlee, Boult, Cowie.
10 teams, 44 players
8 – Sutcliffe
7 – Cowie, Hadlee
6 – Dempster, JR Reid, Turner
5 – Crowe, Vettori
4 – Donnelly
3 – Downes, Reese, Bond, Cairns
2 – Fisher, Frith, Hemus, Upham, AB Williams, Blunt, Hiddleston, Congdon, Bruce Taylor, Fleming, McCullum, Watling, Williamson
1 – Barton, Baker, de Maus, Neill, Dacre, Brice, James, Hedley Howarth, Motz, Wadsworth, Burtt, Merritt, Ian Smith, Wright, JF Reid, Richardson, Boult, Ross Taylor
At that point, Hadlee was third in NZ's list of leading Test wicket takers, behind Collinge (116) and Bruce Taylor (111). The next three in the list, Motz, Howarth and Reid, were also included in the Cricket Society team. Jack Cowie was still regarded as NZ's best bowler to date, despite having taken only 45 Test wickets.Hadlee in tests at this point
26 tests 844 @ 20.09, 107 @ 30.14
He was so glad to be selected that he upped his game after that.