The only situation I can think of is if they're miles ahead in the game and wanting to score runs to set up a declaration knowing full well that the other team will refuse to bat in the same conditions.Why would the batting side agree to face a pink ball under lights instead of keeping innings intact for the next day?
Don't see how its much different to the clouds rolling in and making batting harder.Any plans Starc had for retiring have probably just been shelved.
What a farce!! Team batting nicely as the light starts to dim.......switch the lights on, change to a pink ball, watch the carnage unfold.
The only situation I can think of is if they're miles ahead in the game and wanting to score runs to set up a declaration knowing full well that the other team will refuse to bat in the same conditions.
Other than that, cannot imagine this ever being brought in to play.
Mind you, in that situation, I suspect the bowling team would refuse to it.
Last session of the test possibly to win but have to face the pink ball to do it.Why would the batting side agree to face a pink ball under lights instead of keeping innings intact for the next day?
I mean the whole approach I've seen in pink ball tests is to avoid batting under lights
Because one is a natural phenomenon that has been a part of Test Cricket for 130 years......and the other is a recent addition to try and bring more Aussies to the game once they've finished shopping or going to the beach!!Don't see how its much different to the clouds rolling in and making batting harder.
it says agree in advance, which i assume to be before the match startsWhy would the batting side agree to face a pink ball under lights instead of keeping innings intact for the next day?
I mean the whole approach I've seen in pink ball tests is to avoid batting under lights
Natural or unnatural same effect. Aussies don't play at durban and we would have to start at 7:00 for bad light not to interfere. So I welcome it for certain venues.Because one is a natural phenomenon that has been a part of Test Cricket for 130 years......and the other is a recent addition to try and bring more Aussies to the game once they've finished shopping or going to the beach!!
The implementation of both solutions are not mutually exclusive.Absolute stupidity
How about not sticking rigidly to game must start at X time every day and game has to finish by x time every day.
In England we could start at 10am most days and it wouldn't make any difference to starting at 11 to make up time.
Ditto they end play after the extra 30 mins I might add at 630pm when the light is still perfectly fine for cricket.
They used to be able to bowl 90 overs in a day when Tuffers used to smoke tabs on the outfield. So what's changed exactly apart from DRS.
I thought the modern cricketer was much fitter how about hurrying up between overs.
Might also help stop asking for 75 ball changes a day. Then having impromptu drink breaks every time someone needs a new helmet/glove etc.
Yep, Indeed will be decided prior to the match commencing.Hmmmm. I dont think they'd be switching to a pink ball if the lights come on. Pretty sure they'd be playing with the pink ball the entire test right?