It's not so much the draw = half a win differential on its own, it's that ratio in conjunction with bonus points. If a side gets 6 bonus points then the ratio of win points to draw points is 1.57:1 which is probably too low.As noted above, the 8 points for a draw is ridiculous, but most teams are quite close on wins and losses too.
I think you still need batting bonus points, or you risk someone like Sibley just settling in for 2 days with no need to score at any particular rate. No one wants to see that.It's not so much the draw = half a win differential on its own, it's that ratio in conjunction with bonus points. If a side gets 6 bonus points then the ratio of win points to draw points is 1.57:1 which is probably too low.
I would question whether we still need bonus points in an era of four day cricket. They had more meaning in the three day era with restrictions on the first innings.
I think bonus points in a game like cricket in which one draw can be very different from another draw (not to mention one in which the elements can play such a role) are necessary, I think getting the maximum 3 bowling bonus points for getting 9 wickets within 110 overs is a bit generous thoughI think you still need batting bonus points, or you risk someone like Sibley just settling in for 2 days with no need to score at any particular rate. No one wants to see that.
I'd go 6 for the draw. In football, the draw points would essentially be 5.33 compared to the win.
The problem with removing bonus points is what if your a side that's been behind the game and the weather saves you.It's not so much the draw = half a win differential on its own, it's that ratio in conjunction with bonus points. If a side gets 6 bonus points then the ratio of win points to draw points is 1.57:1 which is probably too low.
I would question whether we still need bonus points in an era of four day cricket. They had more meaning in the three day era with restrictions on the first innings.
This would be better to calculate for the County ChampionshipIn some leagues there used to be "winning draws" and "losing draws" which carried different numbers of points. Wonder if that might be another option. Hard to come up with a completely uncontroversial way to calculate them though.
Something like the old pools panel, assuming most of us in the uk can remember those days, could sit in judgement!In some leagues there used to be "winning draws" and "losing draws" which carried different numbers of points. Wonder if that might be another option. Hard to come up with a completely uncontroversial way to calculate them though.
Points were given for first innings lead under quite a few points systems up until the 1970s.In some leagues there used to be "winning draws" and "losing draws" which carried different numbers of points. Wonder if that might be another option. Hard to come up with a completely uncontroversial way to calculate them though.
I'll be livid if any of them get crocked playing in a pointless franchise tournament when we really need to get promoted from Div 2.(Northants) Ben Sanderson, Saif Zaib, James Sales
Cant believe how poor they areI think Hampshire are very much done.