Thats a shame, was a great servant for hantsLeft FC cricket to play in the Pakistan super league.
Thats a shame, was a great servant for hantsLeft FC cricket to play in the Pakistan super league.
Doesn't take in the current need for rotation. Lancs played ASD, Bailey, Anderson and Balderson in match 1, Stanley, Coughlin, Anderson & Bailey in match 2, and originally selected Anderson, ASD, Balderson and Coughlin in match 3. Whether that is right on a match by match basis, that is what is behind their selection policy, as we know rotation is supposed to help bowlers last the whole season.This Sub rule is getting crazy with a pace bowler in the squad not being allowed to replace another pace bowler. I read that the match referee decision that they were not "like-for-like" was based on Record/stats.
Dale - 41 games, 104 wkts @ 35.81
(417 runs @ 11.58)
Bailey - 125 games, 433 wkts @ 24.71
(2678 runs @ 18.59)
Surely the fact that Dale was in the XI and Bailey wasn't means that despite their records Dale was considered the better bowler for this match?
An allrounder with a career average of 18? Both he and ASD average between 10 and 20.There are loads of Bailey-alikes in county cricket who take stacks of wickets at under 25 each season and are never in contention for England because they don't bowl fast enough. See also Ben Sanderson, Ollie Hannon-Dalby, Jamie Porter, Chris Rushworth, Lewis Gregory, etc. Going back further you had the likes of David Masters and Alan Richardson.
In the case of Bailey I think the selectors are right, he is a 75mph trundler who's skilful and deadly on English wickets but I can't imagine him having much success in India or Australia.
I'm wondering if this substitution was denied because Bailey is considered an all-rounder whereas ASD is an out and out bowler?
All sides miss one match in the first seven weeks.why are there only 8 teams playing in this round?
another full substitute?Zafar Gohar hits a brisk 83 and then decides he isn't fit to take the field, so Middlesex substitute him for Luke Hollman. On the strength of Hollman's two overs so far I think Northants will be delighted.
I assume so, all the Middlesex fans in the Youtube chat were bemoaning that Hollman wasn't in the starting XI, and he didn't bat.another full substitute?
Wonder if Lancashire are making a point that Sutton is not really like-for-like. I can't imagine neither Bailey or Dale would not have bowled in that session.All that hubbub and Sutton hasn’t even bowled yet lol
Yeah I decided it made sense to pin it for people who wanted to follow red ball cricket at this time of year given noone plays Tests during IPL season anymore, especially since the County Championship has lots of overseas players that people from their home countries like to follow.This thread isn't normally pinned.
Where it belongs and around the same length as the IPL thread since that started
Smeed brought in as the replacement opener last week but has yet to do the job![]()
Maybe Bailey wasn't fully fit at the start of the match and wasn't risked, but recovered a bit in the days that followed and they were comfortable bringing him in for the end of the game?This Sub rule is getting crazy with a pace bowler in the squad not being allowed to replace another pace bowler. I read that the match referee decision that they were not "like-for-like" was based on Record/stats.
Dale - 41 games, 104 wkts @ 35.81
(417 runs @ 11.58)
Bailey - 125 games, 433 wkts @ 24.71
(2678 runs @ 18.59)
Surely the fact that Dale was in the XI and Bailey wasn't means that despite their records Dale was considered the better bowler for this match?
Dale pulled his hammy after 2 overs, so game was only 4 overs old when they tried to sub in BaileyMaybe Bailey wasn't fully fit at the start of the match and wasn't risked, but recovered a bit in the days that followed and they were comfortable bringing him in for the end of the game?
Very weird situation anyway. As ataraxia said the march officials have basically deemed the Lancs selectors are stupid.
They are splitting it up and i believe the other 10 wlll play another weekwhy are there only 8 teams playing in this round?
Well given that the Shield is only six teams and there are eight teams in the division above the one McSweeney is playing in, that's not really surprising.Big Sween with two tons. The County Comp really is a step down.
Not sure that would be the case for either Dale and Wells. The latter is the latest to need a replacement with what looked like a dislocated shoulder.I bet if we paused the subs rule for a round players would magically remain fit.
Hardly surprised old boy, disappointed in the mother nation. This is a comp where Bopara averaged 40 after all.Well given that the Shield is only six teams and there are eight teams in the division above the one McSweeney is playing in, that's not really surprising.
10 teams above actually, and there is a noticeable difference in quality between the two too. Which makes it even funnier that Crawley cannot buy a run in Div 2.Well given that the Shield is only six teams and there are eight teams in the division above the one McSweeney is playing in, that's not really surprising.
yes but **** posting?Well given that the Shield is only six teams and there are eight teams in the division above the one McSweeney is playing in, that's not really surprising.