mackembhoy
International Vice-Captain
I'd bat Stokes at 7 never mind 3, especially as his bowling has had a renaissance and looking a stronger attribute over his batting.Seeing some more pieces about who to pick at 3 if Bethell can’t play in the first Test, which begs the question do the media know more than us at this stage?
The i have gone for Stokes to replace him at 3, which I think would have been sensible a couple of years ago, but his form with the bat has fallen off a cliff (it would be a bit like when we put Mo up there in the Ashes!). Ultimately Rew is a number 4, so he wouldn’t be in his preferred position, but it’s not as if it would be a totally alien position for him, he’s batted in the top 3 before
With a pretty inexperienced attack(hopefully they pick Robinson) his bowling I imagine is going to be called upon a lot this summer.
I know Stokes approach is always to run through a brick wall but he can't do it all with his fitness issues in recent years.
I'd back Rew to go well at 3 if they do put him there. But at the same time we've been shoehorning in new players into positions they've not been suited to for a good 7 years now.
You've seen for a long time teams picking debutants down the order and promoting them once games under their belts.
I'd not be against Rew batting 6 if Bethell doesn't make it in time for the first test.