Link to or post the numbers pls. No clue what numbers you mean.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
DoG's top 100 test bowler countdown: Adjust for wickets per innings
- Thread starter Days of Grace
- Start date
h_hurricane
International Vice-Captain
I know it is very hard and @Days of Grace may have to lookup every test cricketer who bowled, but one upfront request regardless of the criteria finalized here. Please give us the ranking of Rubel Hossain, even if it is high 4 digits. It will be a tribute to the great cricketer who called it a day and achieved something Marshall or Bumrah could only dream of - A fifer in NZ.
Fuller Pilch
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
WPI is more important than WPM imo.
Look at Jack Cowie. The poor bloke played 1 test in 1946 and NZ only took 8 wickets vs Australia in an innings loss (Aus 198/8 declared) but Cowie took 6/40.
Then the following year (1947) they only played 1 again and again he got a 6-fer (6/83) as England scored 265/7 in a rain-affected draw.
12 wickets in 2 years doesn't sound like much, but 12 in 2 innings or 12 out of 15 taken is outstanding.
Look at Jack Cowie. The poor bloke played 1 test in 1946 and NZ only took 8 wickets vs Australia in an innings loss (Aus 198/8 declared) but Cowie took 6/40.
Then the following year (1947) they only played 1 again and again he got a 6-fer (6/83) as England scored 265/7 in a rain-affected draw.
12 wickets in 2 years doesn't sound like much, but 12 in 2 innings or 12 out of 15 taken is outstanding.