subshakerz
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Epstein considered Imran a big danger as per the leaks.Whose side was Epstein on
Epstein considered Imran a big danger as per the leaks.Whose side was Epstein on
Epstein like invented video game microtransactions.Whose side was Epstein on
Nah here I think there was a definite connection to the Pak policy on US, although I dunno if the US were actively involved in the resultant coup.We in subcontinent exaggerate the role of US in political events IMO. Apparently the toppling of govts in Bangladesh and Nepal were also done by US. I don't believe any of it.
Yup. More on it here.Nah here I think there was a definite connection to the Pak policy on US, although I dunno if the US were actively involved in the resultant coup.
I'm sure US has their favorites in the region. And there are some levers they pull to trade favours. Same as India in the region. I just don't think they can orchestrate regime changes at will.Nah here I think there was a definite connection to the Pak policy on US, although I dunno if the US were actively involved in the resultant coup.
It’s rather simple. The US likes more pliable puppets, Imran for all his faults is a stubborn guy who doesn’t like taking orders.Imo imran was not liked by us&west because he used anti Americanism as wepon to gain predominance in kpk(kpk was trageted by American drones durin 08-14) also called bin laden a martyr and mocked usa saying taliban broke shackles of slavery. It made usa suspicious of him and made sure Republican or Democrat no us administiton would support him which duly followed by uk and eu
Yeah it's very well written. The thing to take out of this is more than his skills, it was Imran's presence that enabled some of the lesser players to perform at their most optimum level. It's a very useful thing when you are running a cricket team. Not everyone is as good as you but if you provide them an environment to flourish, the standing of the team rises ten folds. Current Pakistan team lacks that fight and self believe more than anything else. Talent will come and go but if you lose the dog then it is a downward spiral. Sajid Khan is the prototype cricketer under Imran, guy with limited ability but great character. You see him bat, bowl or field, it's 100% commitment every single time. Pak needs more players like him.![]()
Lord of Leeds: when Imran Khan ruled supreme at Headingley
Four decades ago, Pakistan landed their first and only innings victory in England, en route to a famous series winwww.thecricketmonthly.com
Great read
Yup. Mentorship is sorely lacking.Yeah it's very well written. The thing to take out of this is more than his skills, it was Imran's presence that enabled some of the lesser players to perform at their most optimum level. It's a very useful thing when you are running a cricket team. Not everyone is as good as you but if you provide them an environment to flourish, the standing of the team rises ten folds. Current Pakistan team lacks that fight and self believe more than anything else. Talent will come and go but if you lose the dog then it is a downward spiral. Sajid Khan is the prototype cricketer under Imran, guy with limited ability but great character. You see him bat, bowl or field, it's 100% commitment every single time. Pak needs more players like him.
I had always rated Imran as better than Kallis when this was discussion ever came about because in their primary disciplines I had Imran ahead but not far, though I rated Imran's batting higher than Kallis's bowling by a reasonable amountImran is a top 3 all rounder easily.
At worst, Top 5.
Imran the bowler > Kallis the batsman as wellI had always rated Imran as better than Kallis when this was discussion ever came about because in their primary disciplines I had Imran ahead but not far, though I rated Imran's batting higher than Kallis's bowling by a reasonable amount
That's what I meant when I said that I had Imran ahead in their primary disciplines but not by much. Of course, it is a fair shout that Kallis was a greater fielder too but even so, I would still have had Imran ahaed overall.Imran the bowler > Kallis the batsman as well
Think Imran is the better all rounder, Kallis the better all round cricketer?I had always rated Imran as better than Kallis when this was discussion ever came about because in their primary disciplines I had Imran ahead but not far, though I rated Imran's batting higher than Kallis's bowling by a reasonable amount
I think Imran was more valuable and better in primary, just.That's what I meant when I said that I had Imran ahead in their primary disciplines but not by much. Of course, it is a fair shout that Kallis was a greater fielder too but even so, I would still have had Imran ahaed overall.
And an elite top 5.Imran is a top 3 all rounder easily.
At worst, Top 5.
I am always astounded listening to cricketers how lousy they are with stats.
WK are not all rounders.And an elite top 5.
Sobers
Imran
Kallis
Miller
Gilchrist