• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

All-Time World XIs - ODIs

cricketfan55

U19 Vice-Captain
Some people are reluctant to put B Richards in all time test teams due to only playing 1 series in which he was absolutely outstanding and averaged over 70, yet Sobers can be picked in all-time ODI teams after playing 1 ODI in which he scored a 6-ball duck and took a wicket. Can a player who scored zero ODI runs really be considered as an ODI allrounder?
I agree, I personally think it makes more sense to pick ODI XIs based on what players have achieved in ODIs rather than what they had the potential to achieve (based on their other results)
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Some people are reluctant to put B Richards in all time test teams due to only playing 1 series in which he was absolutely outstanding and averaged over 70, yet Sobers can be picked in all-time ODI teams after playing 1 ODI in which he scored a 6-ball duck and took a wicket. Can a player who scored zero ODI runs really be considered as an ODI allrounder?
Yeah we might as well pick Bradman in the next team.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Tough on Yuvraj, but Shakib's SLAs make his bowling a bit redundant.

Daryl Mitchell
Tough one: Abdul Razzaq & Chris Harris are close, but I'll go Russell Arnold
Lasith Malinga
Arnold over Yuvraj is wild. We already have Shakib as the fifth bowler so we don't really need an allrounder, and Arnold's bowling isn't necessarily better than Root's or Waugh's anyway (and I'd argue it's worse than Dilshan's). Yuvraj is clearly a better batsman.
 
Last edited:

Michaelf7777777

International Regular
Some people are reluctant to put B Richards in all time test teams due to only playing 1 series in which he was absolutely outstanding and averaged over 70, yet Sobers can be picked in all-time ODI teams after playing 1 ODI in which he scored a 6-ball duck and took a wicket. Can a player who scored zero ODI runs really be considered as an ODI allrounder?
My interpretation is the playing an ODI is a requirement and then using all evidence about the eligible players (those who played an ODI) to work out who would be the best option for that position and the attribute that really helps Sobers for me beyond his shear all round quality is the ability to bowl left arm fast-medium, left arm finger spin and left arm wrist spin which means he can change style mid over depending on the batter on strike's weaknesses and can also mean that the style of your 5th bowler can adjust based on all available information, including actually game play, on how the pitch is playing
 

capt_Luffy

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
My interpretation is the playing an ODI is a requirement and then using all evidence about the eligible players (those who played an ODI) to work out who would be the best option for that position and the attribute that really helps Sobers for me beyond his shear all round quality is the ability to bowl left arm fast-medium, left arm finger spin and left arm wrist spin which means he can change style mid over depending on the batter on strike's weaknesses and can also mean that the style of your 5th bowler can adjust based on all available information, including actually game play, on how the pitch is playing
It's the same why Grace made World B or Barry did World C Test teams. Don't think there's much different tbh
 

Fuller Pilch

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Arnold over Yuvraj is wild. We already have Shakib as the fifth bowler so we don't really need an allrounder, and Arnold's bowling isn't necessarily better than Root's or Waugh's anyway (and I'd argue it's worse than Dilshan's). Yuvraj is clearly a better batsman.
I agree but Arnold was a finisher at 7, while Yuvraj was a 4/5. It is Mitchell over Yuvi
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Is Darryl Mitchell there already? Seems crazy premature. Crowe and Inzi should still be ahead. Morgan too.

I'll go

Inzi
Yuvraj
Vaas
 

capt_Luffy

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yuvraj Singh - 10
Darryl Mitchell - 8

Garry Sobers - 5
Inzamam-ul-Haq - 4
Ben Stokes - 2
Kane Williamson - 1
Arjuna Ranatunga - 1
Russell Arnold - 1

Trent Boult - 8
Chaminda Vaas - 5
Lasith Malinga - 2
Dale Steyn - 1
 

capt_Luffy

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
World XIWorld AWorld BWorld C
1. SR Tendulkar1. AC Gilchrist+1. CG Greenidge1. Q de Kock+
2. RG Sharma2. HM Amla2. ST Jayasuriya2. DA Warner
3. V Kohli3. RT Ponting*3. DM Jones3. MB Azam
4. IVA Richards4. SZK Abbas4. BC Lara4. GS Chappell
5. AB de Villiers5. A Symonds5. JC Buttler+5. PA de Silva
6. MS Dhoni+*6. MG Bevan6. MEK Hussey6. CH Lloyd*
7. SM Pollock7. NR Kapil Dev7. L Klusener7. A Flintoff
8. W Akram8. RJ Hadlee8. SK Warne*8. B Lee
9. J Garner9. MA Starc9. CEL Ambrose9. MA Holding
10. M Muralitharan10. S Mushtaq10. SE Bond10. WM Younis
11. GD McGrath11. JJ Bumrah11. AA Donald11. S Ajmal
World DWorld E
1. S Anwar1. ME Waugh
2. SR Watson2. TM Dilshan
3. KC Sangakkara+3. JE Root
4. MJ Miandad4. SD Hope+
5. LRPL Taylor5. Y Singh
6. DA Miller6. DJ Mitchell
7. GJ Maxwell7. S Al Hasan
8. IAN Khan*8. RA Khan
9. MA Shami9. AME Roberts
10. DK Lillee10. NW Bracken
11. MI Tahir11. TA Boult
 
Last edited:

Top