• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Absurdly Awesome Cricket Stats

zaremba

Cricketer Of The Year
In a (big) case I'm doing in my day job as a lawyer, my side has produced a number of witness statements.

Bear with me on this.

  • Witness statements: 9
  • Total page count: 732
  • Average pages per statement: 81.33
  • Statements of over 100 pages: 3

So what? Well, here's David Gower's 1985 Ashes series:

  • Innings: 9
  • Total runs: 732
  • Average: 81.33
  • Centuries: 3
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
In a (big) case I'm doing in my day job as a lawyer, my side has produced a number of witness statements.

Bear with me on this.

  • Witness statements: 9
  • Total page count: 732
  • Average pages per statement: 81.33
  • Statements of over 100 pages: 3

So what? Well, here's David Gower's 1985 Ashes series:

  • Innings: 9
  • Total runs: 732
  • Average: 81.33
  • Centuries: 3
It's a conspiracy. Release the Gower files
 

Adders

International Coach
In a (big) case I'm doing in my day job as a lawyer, my side has produced a number of witness statements.

Bear with me on this.

  • Witness statements: 9
  • Total page count: 732
  • Average pages per statement: 81.33
  • Statements of over 100 pages: 3

So what? Well, here's David Gower's 1985 Ashes series:

  • Innings: 9
  • Total runs: 732
  • Average: 81.33
  • Centuries: 3
I mean how the **** do you even work out this is a thing? Its both utterly ridiculous and incredible at the same time.
 

sayon basak

International Coach
Bert Vance conceded 77 runs in a single over — the most expensive over in first-class cricket history (contrived category), consisting of 22 balls, bowled by Wellington against Canterbury on February 20, 1990, in a Shell Trophy first-class match at Lancaster Park (now AMI Stadium) in Christchurch, New Zealand.

I'm pretty sure this record is well known, but the context might not be as well known. The context was pure end-of-season desperation; Wellington needed a win to clinch the domestic title and had set Canterbury a target of 291 runs in 59 overs. By the final day, Canterbury reached 196 for 8 after 57 overs, with Lee Germon unbeaten on 75 — the match looked headed for a draw. To force a result, Wellington's captain and players devised a bizarre plan: bowl deliberately loose deliveries (full tosses and beamers) via part-time bowler Bert Vance (who had little to lose in his figures) to gift runs and encourage Canterbury to chase aggressively, risking their last wickets. Vance bowled a marathon over with 17 no-balls (mostly intentional), and only the second ball was legitimate in the first 17 deliveries. Germon smashed 70 runs off it (including eight sixes and five fours), racing to his century on the sixth ball, while Roger Ford chipped in a few. The scoring sequence read: 0-4-4-4-6-6-4-6-1-4-1-0-6-6-6-6-6-0-0-4-0-1 (with extras from no-balls inflating the total). Confusion reigned — scorers enlisted spectators for help, and the umpire mistakenly called "over" after just five legitimate balls.

Canterbury finished on 290 for 8 — agonizingly one run short of victory — so the match drew anyway. XD.
 

sayon basak

International Coach
In 1900, South Africa’s Jimmy Sinclair hit a ball that landed in a train carriage at the Old Wanderers stadium. The train was headed to Port Elizabeth, roughly 556 miles away.
So yeah, there you have it, the longest six ever recorded.

Jokes aside, here's the incident of Albert Trott hitting a massive six over the Lord's pavillion:
Facing the Australian bowler Monty Noble, on July 31, 1899 in an MCC vs Australians match, Trott smashed a ball so high and long that it cleared the entire roof of the Pavilion, soared over the chimney pots, and landed in the garden of the Pavilion clerk on the other side. To this day, Albert Trott remains the only player in history to have ever hit a ball completely over the Lord’s Pavilion. There are numerous source confirming this stroke, including Noble himself.
The center of the pitch at Lord’s is roughly 60–65 meters away from the Pavilion. For the ball to clear the entire building (which is about 20 meters deep) and land in the garden on the other side, the total carry was likely between 115 and 125 meters (pretty big). Reports mention the ball actually clipped one of the chimney stacks on its way down. This suggests it was a towering six rather than a flat one. If it hadn't clipped the chimney, it likely would have travelled even further into the St. John’s Wood neighborhood.
He almost got known singularity for it. He spent the rest of his career trying to recreat it, but in vain.

This might not be the longest six, but when you factor in how thin bats used to be in the 1890s and he did it off a slow-medium pacer, this hit might be more impressive than others.
 
Last edited:

Coronis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
In 1900, South Africa’s Jimmy Sinclair hit a ball that landed in a train carriage at the Old Wanderers stadium. The train was headed to Port Elizabeth, roughly 556 miles away.
So yeah, there you have it, the longest six ever recorded.

Jokes aside, here's the incident of Albert Trott hitting a massive six over the Lord's pavillion:
Facing the Australian bowler Monty Noble, on July 31, 1899 in an MCC vs Australians match, Trott smashed a ball so high and long that it cleared the entire roof of the Pavilion, soared over the chimney pots, and landed in the garden of the Pavilion clerk on the other side. To this day, Albert Trott remains the only player in history to have ever hit a ball completely over the Lord’s Pavilion. There are numerous source confirming this stroke, including Noble himself.
The center of the pitch at Lord’s is roughly 60–65 meters away from the Pavilion. For the ball to clear the entire building (which is about 20 meters deep) and land in the garden on the other side, the total carry was likely between 115 and 125 meters (pretty big). Reports mention the ball actually clipped one of the chimney stacks on its way down. This suggests it was a towering six rather than a flat one. If it hadn't clipped the chimney, it likely would have travelled even further into the St. John’s Wood neighborhood.
He almost got known singularity for it. He spent the rest of his career trying to recreat it, but in vain.

This might not be the longest six, but when you factor in how thin bats used to be in the 1890s and he did it off a slow-medium pacer, this hit might be more impressive than others.
A truly tragic figure, and one of the cricketers I enjoyed reading about when I was young.

Younger brother of Harry Trott, a huge presence in Australian cricket at the time.

His test debut is the best of all time imo. At 21, after just 3 first class matches, he scored 38* and 72* batting at 10 in both innings, and taking 8/43 - the best innings figures on debut - in the final innings. In his second match he’d score 85* and didn’t bowl, before a mediocre performance in his third and final Ashes test, leaving him with the remarkable Ashes averages of 102.50 and 21.33. For a completely unknown reason he was left out of the Aussie touring side the next year to England, and ended up moving there that year for county instead, going on to represent England against South Africa. In both 1899 and 1900 he scored over 1000 runs and took over 100 wickets in the season. He was also an excellent fielder. He was considered at this point to be arguably the finest allrounder in the English game.

Sadly his game deteriorated after this point, suffering both due to alcoholism, depression and edema. In 1907 in his benefit match he took 4 wickets in 4 balls and a hattrick in the same innings, costing himself plenty by ending the match early. In 1914 however he was done, and left his wardrobe and 4 pounds to his landlady before offing himself.
 
Last edited:

sayon basak

International Coach
A truly tragic figure, and one of the cricketers I enjoyed reading about when I was young.

Younger brother of Harry Trott, a huge presence in Australian cricket at the time.

His test debut is the best of all time imo. At 21, after just 3 first class matches, he scored 38* and 72* batting at 10 in both innings, and taking 8/43 - the best innings figures on debut - in the final innings. In his second match he’d score 85* and didn’t bowl, before a mediocre performance in his third and final Ashes test, leaving him with the remarkable Ashes averages of 102.50 and 21.33. For a completely unknown reason he was left out of the Aussie touring side the next year to England, and ended up moving there that year for county instead, going on to represent England against South Africa. In both 1899 and 1900 he scored over 1000 runs and took over 100 wickets in the season. He was also an excellent fielder. He was considered at this point to be arguably the finest allrounder in the English game.

Sadly his game deteriorated after this point, suffering both due to alcoholism, depression and edema. In 1907 in his benefit match he took 4 wickets in 4 balls and a hattrick in the same innings, costing himself plenty by ending the match early. In 1914 however he was done, and left his wardrobe and 4 pounds to his landlady before offing himself.
Both the brothers' lives are extremely depressing.

I'd suggest this podcast to anybody who is interested.
 
Last edited:

zaremba

Cricketer Of The Year
I mean how the **** do you even work out this is a thing? Its both utterly ridiculous and incredible at the same time.
I thought jeez we've got a lot of witness statements here. Idly counted the pages, and (as Coronis guessed) the number 732 is one of those that will always be with me. Then I dug a bit more and holy cow it's 1985 all over again, but without Botham bowling long hops
 

Coronis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I thought jeez we've got a lot of witness statements here. Idly counted the pages, and (as Coronis guessed) the number 732 is one of those that will always be with me. Then I dug a bit more and holy cow it's 1985 all over again, but without Botham bowling long hops
Oh keep at a case long enough there’ll be a few long hops.
 

thierry henry

International Coach
Bert Vance conceded 77 runs in a single over — the most expensive over in first-class cricket history (contrived category), consisting of 22 balls, bowled by Wellington against Canterbury on February 20, 1990, in a Shell Trophy first-class match at Lancaster Park (now AMI Stadium) in Christchurch, New Zealand.

I'm pretty sure this record is well known, but the context might not be as well known. The context was pure end-of-season desperation; Wellington needed a win to clinch the domestic title and had set Canterbury a target of 291 runs in 59 overs. By the final day, Canterbury reached 196 for 8 after 57 overs, with Lee Germon unbeaten on 75 — the match looked headed for a draw. To force a result, Wellington's captain and players devised a bizarre plan: bowl deliberately loose deliveries (full tosses and beamers) via part-time bowler Bert Vance (who had little to lose in his figures) to gift runs and encourage Canterbury to chase aggressively, risking their last wickets. Vance bowled a marathon over with 17 no-balls (mostly intentional), and only the second ball was legitimate in the first 17 deliveries. Germon smashed 70 runs off it (including eight sixes and five fours), racing to his century on the sixth ball, while Roger Ford chipped in a few. The scoring sequence read: 0-4-4-4-6-6-4-6-1-4-1-0-6-6-6-6-6-0-0-4-0-1 (with extras from no-balls inflating the total). Confusion reigned — scorers enlisted spectators for help, and the umpire mistakenly called "over" after just five legitimate balls.

Canterbury finished on 290 for 8 — agonizingly one run short of victory — so the match drew anyway. XD.
I've never understood how they expected to take wickets by....bowling no-balls? Was he trying to bowl high full tosses, hoping that one might end up slightly below waist height?

It's also surprising that Germon fell for such an obvious trap - presumably he couldn't have known for certain that all of those no balls were going to be called, yet time and again he (I assume) took the risk of hitting it over the fielders.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I've never understood how they expected to take wickets by....bowling no-balls? Was he trying to bowl high full tosses, hoping that one might end up slightly below waist height?

It's also surprising that Germon fell for such an obvious trap - presumably he couldn't have known for certain that all of those no balls were going to be called, yet time and again he (I assume) took the risk of hitting it over the fielders.
I believe the target was to give them enough runs that victory would be tangible to them, and try to take the remaining 2 wickets the next over when they will take more chances. sameway, Germon did the right thing attacking blatant no-balls and almost winning a dead draw.
 

ataraxia

Hall of Fame Member
It can be a good last-over strategy too, however. If you, bowl one or two intentional front-foot no balls, you get time for a longer and more convincing set-up.
 

Coronis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
13 times has a keeper exceeded 25 dismissals in a test series.

Once by an Englishman - Jack Russell with 27 dismissals in South Africa - in just 7 innings! Every other player at least kept in 9 innings.

Twice by South Africans (Waite and Boucher) - Waite’s being the only one in a series not involving Australia or England, as it came against New Zealand in 61/62.

Ten times by Australians. Marsh, Healy, Gilchrist and Carey twice each, and Haddin and Paine once each.

Best for other countries.

Rishabh Pant - 25
Deryck Murray - 24
Artie Dick - 23
Amal Silva - 22
Sarfaraz Ahmed - 19
Wayne James/Andy Flower - 13
Litton Das - 12
Asfar Zazai - 8
Gary Wilson - 6
 
Last edited:

AndrewB

International Vice-Captain
13 times has a keeper exceeded 25 dismissals in a test series.

Once by an Englishman - Jack Russell with 27 dismissals in South Africa - in just 7 innings! Every other player at least kept in 9 innings.

Twice by South Africans (Waite and Boucher) - Waite’s being the only one in a series not involving Australia or England, as it came against New Zealand in 61/62.

Ten times by Australians. Marsh, Healy, Gilchrist and Carey twice each, and Haddin and Paine once each.

Best for other countries.

Rishabh Pant - 25
Deryck Murray - 24
Artie Dick - 23
Amal Silva - 22
Sarfaraz Ahmed - 19
Wayne James/Andy Flower - 13
Litton Das - 12
Asfar Zazai - 8
Gary Wilson - 6
Amal Silva's 22 is comfortably the record for a 3-Test series; no-one else has more than 19.
 

Top