That triple was very good and not meaningless - he got 54% of the team's runs with barely any support (2nd highest was 72) and was the last man out, got to his 300 with consecutive sixes as well - SR 66, wasn't grindy.Forgot about Sanga's triple vs. Bangladesh last year.
Is it the greatest triple ever according to cricrate?That triple was very good and not meaningless - he got 54% of the team's runs with barely any support (2nd highest was 72) and was the last man out, got to his 300 with consecutive sixes as well - SR 66, wasn't grindy.
Man, once again, saying someone has the worst 300 doesn't mean its not a good innings.That triple was very good and not meaningless - he got 54% of the team's runs with barely any support (2nd highest was 72) and was the last man out, got to his 300 with consecutive sixes as well - SR 66, wasn't grindy.
Finest bowler of leg side wides to right handers in world cricket.Thats a hat-trick of wides from Chigumbura.
There are a lot worse 300s, but this is a pointless discussion.Man, once again, saying someone has the worst 300 doesn't mean its not a good innings.
Yeah it's like saying Kohli's armpit is the thing you find least attractive about him.Man, once again, saying someone has the worst 300 doesn't mean its not a good innings.
What's the worst in your opinion?There are a lot worse 300s, but this is a pointless discussion.
Nah its good.There are a lot worse 300s, but this is a pointless discussion.
This was a fair call after he bowled the first one, even if I do say so myself.Can't have a Zim ODI without Chigumbura having an over of leg side wides.
So good.Yeah it's like saying Kohli's armpit is the thing you find least attractive about him.