Defnitely not. Kohli's about 5 times better, but the rest of the team is a mixed bag. Openers are extremely hit and miss,and we don't have anyone even close to Zaheer's quality in the bowling department.
Not sure I agree with this. India look a better balanced side than they did in 2011. I feel the bowling certainly is better.
Bhuvi, Shami, Ishant, Umesh, Jadeja, Ashwin, Binny (assuming this are the bowlers/allrounders picked) v Zaheer, Munaf, Nehra, Sreesanth, Yusuf, chawla, Harbhajan and Ashwin.
Zaheer probably beats Bhuvi but I think Shami edges Munaf and I would take Ishant and Umesh anyday over Nehra and Sreesanth.
Ashwin definitely better now that he was in 2011. Jadeja v Harbhajan is close but I think Sir probably wins that and I don't think Binny is any worse than Yusuf or Chawla.
Regarding the batting: Kohli and Raina are better players than they were in 2011. I don't think MS is worse than he was then.
Shikhar Dhawan isn't any inferior to Gambhir in ODIs. Sehwag on numbers probably a better player than Rahane but I feel Rahane's figures
will improve and I don't think he's really that far behind Sehwag in quality.
The real advantage the 2011 side had were Tendy and Yuvraj especially with Yuvraj being a big game match winner.
The 2015 side has Rayudu, Uthappa (likely) and Rohit. Rohit has the talent I think to match Yuvraj - the questions is whether he has the big match temperament.
On balance I think the batting was a bit better in 2011 but the 2015 side has better bowling and the flexibility of the side is greater. There are genuine allrounders in the side like Jadeja which the 2011 side didn't have meaning that India can play five bowlers. The 2011 side had to basically rely on Raina and Yuvraj cobbling the final ten overs.