LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksBeating India chasing almost 300. People expected SA might choke especially after their first 4 wickets went down.
Can this be a sign of bigger things to come i.e. putting behind the chokers tag for good?
Beating India chasing almost 300. People expected SA might choke especially after their first 4 wickets went down.
Can this be a sign of bigger things to come i.e. putting behind the chokers tag for good?
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW
Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta
First Step would be winning Quarter-FinalOriginally Posted by smalishah84
Did well to hold their nerve, credit to them. The ****s never choke against us anyway (apart from a game in that ODI series recently).Wish they'd folded in the Cape Town Test instead.
No.
If chasing down 434 against Australia in a ODI doesn't remove the tag, why would a win over India?
If chasing down over 400 against Australia in the 4th innings of a test match on Australian soil doesn't take away the tag, why would a win over India?
Last edited by Jono; 12-03-2011 at 11:49 AM.
India's failure to beat any top 8 teams in their home WC mean they deserve the tag now IMO
I'm just saying
RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.
Yeah, they don't choke every time. It seems to be low totals that maxes out their chokage potential, so chasing a high(ish) score versus a modest bowling unit was always a fair bet.
If they're chasing 220 in a semi versus SL/Pak/Oz:
- As featured in The Independent.
"This is not the time for namby-pamby promising youngsters who might just do something; not the time for building for the future. Pragmatism rules and they don't come more pragmatic than Rogers."
- Victor Marks makes the case for stiff-legged and stiff-armed 35 year old left-handers in Ashes squads
Nah, I think teams that fail to beat those not in the top eight deserve that tag more.
Nah.
Chokers for eternity and beyond.This match doesn't change it.
Being **** isn't the same as choking at all.
We arguably choked versus the Banglas when we had them 8 down with over 50 still needed, but I don't think we choked against Ireland. We just came second to an inspired team.
Was a tongue-in-cheek reply to GIMH's post. Wasn't really being serious. I would say that letting an associate team chase 330 odd from 111/5 was a bit of a choke though.
Fair points both of these
haha....I think that is a good theoryYeah, they don't choke every time. It seems to be low totals that maxes out their chokage potential, so chasing a high(ish) score versus a modest bowling unit was always a fair bet.
If they're chasing 220 in a semi versus SL/Pak/Oz:
We've got to the point where people only have to remember South Africa are playing before they bring it up, regardless of what's happening in the match, what just happened, or if they have yet played a match.
SA don't have to do anything to get labeled with it any more, so I don't see what they can do to get rid of it. Until everyone finds it as tiresome as I do, we're stuck with it.
Maybe we wouldn't be so quick to fill buckets with filth if we knew they had a soul. Or maybe that's what they're into. Ain't no way to get inside a bucket's mind.
quoted for truth.
Thou irate/infuriated/riled that SA won lulz. To quote the mystic PEWS: haters can suck it.
Critisize your own team salman, a team that shipped 0NE HUNDRED RUNS in 5 overs. A team whose batting was exposed by the Canadians eh. Then you have a wk that couldn't catch the black plague even if he tried.
Ind vs PAK Semi Final: PAK WINS
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
