"He's [Michael Clarke] on Twitter saying sorry for not walking? Mate if he did that in our side there'd be hell to play. AB would chuck his Twitter box off the balcony or whatever it is. Sorry for not walking? Jesus Christ man."RIP CraigosKnowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is knowing not to put it into a fruit salad
IMO India should target 1700. It'd be a failure if India win by less than 1695 runs.
Hard to disagree
Originally Posted by Peter Mooresforever 63*
I have a lot of respect for South Africa despite their shocker the other day, they have some of the best pace bowlers in the world and AB is a dashing ODI player.
Our bowling v their top 4 will be the key, if we can some how knock them over then their lower middle order has a bit of a soft belly.
Good point RE failure to chase down 171. Perhaps a total between 100-124 should suffice. Perhaps India should consider a tactical declaration
Last edited by GotSpin; 11-03-2011 at 06:21 PM.
Triple digits? Why do we need triple digits? I'd lead the the burning-of-effigies if more than 90 runs were allowed.
- there will be at least 1 ton from each side and one 4for from each side
- the batting powerplay for each team will be an exciting time (lots of runs or lots of wickets)
- the first batting team will score 350+ and the 2nd team will come damn close to chasing it down but will be bowled out
- classic match which will be generate more than 750 posts in this thread
750 posts are too obvious
Bring it on South Africa, bring it on!
Some serious urine extraction in this thread
We miss you, Fardin. :(. RIP.
A cricket supporter forever
Member of CW Red and AAAS - Appreciating only the best.
Check out this awesome e-fed:
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)