Any other NZ fans still ****ed off?

[Zinzan]

Originally Posted by marc71178

Oram's ability or lack of it against Murali is irrelevant to the catch issue though.

Fair comment that, Oram has always struggled again Murali...mind you, most batsmen have

[Fiery]

Originally Posted by JASON

This thread is about Fiery's frustrations ... I generally ignore these threads , and as a Fellow Lankan I would say nothing you say here will make any difference to the severely mentally scarred author of this thread...leave him to his misery...

You're right about that part, nothing you say here makes any difference to me whatsoever. Probably wont make any difference to the people who have agreed with me in the thread, or to the fellow who started the "Murali is a cheat" thread, or to the commentators who expressed exactly the same viewpoint directly after the incident either

[Richard]

Originally Posted by FaaipDeOiad

For ****'s sake would be filtered. Using the abbreviated form could be construed as avoiding the filter just as much as saying "****", which is obviously a legitimate word in its own right, unlike FFS.

Not that I give a rats arse, but at least clean up your own act before lording over others over pointless crap.

Given that almost everyone does it and no-one ever says a thing, I've always presumed it's not construed as avoiding the filter.

Otherwise, naturally, I'd not have "lorded over" anything, because it would have been hypocritical. But as I see it, it's not.

[16 tins of Spam]

How is that Fiery still has an active account? Worst poster ever.

FWIW, I thought the catch deserved another look, but that doesn't make Murali a cheat. It's quite possible to think you've held a catch when you haven't. Besides, we were that rubbish in the semi-final that it really doesn't make much difference.

[Fiery]

Originally Posted by 16 tins of Spam

How is that Fiery still has an active account? Worst poster ever.

FWIW, I thought the catch deserved another look, but that doesn't make Murali a cheat. It's quite possible to think you've held a catch when you haven't. Besides, we were that rubbish in the semi-final that it really doesn't make much difference.

I've just as much right to my opinion as anyone here and I'm not the only one with that opinion. Pull your head in and keep those comments to yourself.

[16 tins of Spam]

Bite me.

[Fiery]

Originally Posted by 16 tins of Spam

Bite me.

who are you? Bart Simpson.

[Smudge]

Why can't we be friends....

[Fiery]

Originally Posted by Voltman

Why can't we be friends....

Don't know...he just broadsided me

[armchairumpire]

Originally Posted by Fiery

Don't know...he just broadsided me

Give it a break - PLEASE. Your ping pong insults destroy a genuine dialogue for everyone else - I for one am sick of it. Grow up!

[Fiery]

Originally Posted by armchairumpire

Give it a break - PLEASE. Your ping pong insults destroy a genuine dialogue for everyone else - I for one am sick of it. Grow up!

wtf? He insulted me out of the blue by saying "Worst Poster ever", I expressed my surprise to Voltman about the attack and now you start on me...Random

[Richard]

Originally Posted by 16 tins of Spam

How is that Fiery still has an active account? Worst poster ever.

Haha, you weren't around in the times of the Camel56 types.

[Prince EWS]

Originally Posted by Richard

Haha, you weren't around in the times of the Camel56 types.

He was around for FILOCRICKET though. He only lasted about two days however.

[Perm]

No.

[Richard]

Originally Posted by Prince EWS

He was around for FILOCRICKET though. He only lasted about two days however.

I'm actually not sure he was. You'd know better than me as it's likely he only posted in that thread if he was around, but I've only seen 16toS once, very briefly, in the last 2 or 3 weeks.

He lasted 1 day, incidentally. And I honestly think the Camel56 types were even worse, and yes, Gelman did fill me in on some of the nonsense FILOCRICKET posted.