I wonder if every one else had been fit wether he'd have stuck to his original plan - but I think he had to do this. Its true to say they would win first two games without him, but6 if he'd have to come in against SA with no matches for over a month, he might not have made an instant impact. Does anyone think Haddin is a wasted place now - that there might be better specialist batsmen in Australia that Haddin has kept out - or would they have picked him even if Gilchrist had been avaliable for all matches at the time they picked the squad and played him as a batsman if they had injuries?
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Gilchrist available for World Cup, Good news at last!!!
- Thread starter Laurrz
- Start date
