Which is all that matters.
It's correct only if you lap-up the I$C$C$ nonsense about Bangladesh and all the other 7 teams being as good as the top 8.And, the fact is that he took more wickets in games with ODI status than anyone else in 2006, therefore calling him the leading ODI wicket-taker for 2006 is not utterly laughable. It is correct.
If you have some sense and realise they're not, it's laughable.
I have some vendetta to preserve the integrity of ODI cricket. I've no vendetta whatsoever against smaller countries' right to play games, none at all, I think it's great that they're playing against each other, it's far more likely to be of help than being thrashed non-stop. But to class the games ODIs denegrates the integrity of international cricket.You having some vendetta against the smaller countries' rights to play games does not change facts.