• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

New Zealand Black Caps Thread

Blaze

Banned
marc71178 said:
But is Oram's batting in ODI worthy of a spot?
What? Just because he has a poor ODI record doesn't mean he isn't a good player. He hasn't had many opportunites in the past to bat for long periods of time.

Look at his Test record if you want to see how good he can be with the bat.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
I know he has a good Test record, but the 2 forms are not completely equivalent and sorry if questioning an average of under 19 from 62 innings as not being up to scratch.

It clearly is a superb effort and I should never have doubted him.
 

Blaze

Banned
marc71178 said:
I know he has a good Test record, but the 2 forms are not completely equivalent and sorry if questioning an average of under 19 from 62 innings as not being up to scratch.

It clearly is a superb effort and I should never have doubted him.
It just underlines your lack of a cricketing brain if you think Oram is not a good enough batsman to justify selection as an all rounder in the NZ side.

His average is always improving. For example, in his last 10 games he averages 27 with the bat which is fine for an all rounder batting at 8.
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Blaze said:
It just underlines your lack of a cricketing brain if you think Oram is not a good enough batsman to justify selection as an all rounder in the NZ side.

His average is always improving. For example, in his last 10 games he averages 27 with the bat which is fine for an all rounder batting at 8.
Ease up Matt. I agree with what Marc is saying. He's stating simply that although Oram is a quality BATSMAN in Test cricket, he's hardly shown that he is anywhere near as effective in ODI cricket. Marc never questioned his bowling or his allround ability. He questioned his batting. The same was done by Lara with regards to Dwayne Bravo.

When both show that they can bat in ODI cricket, surely then the opinions will change. Until then, Marc's comments are justified in my mind.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
marc71178 said:
But is Oram's batting in ODI worthy of a spot?
Probably not, but I think his bowling is better than the likes of Adams, Franklin, Martin and Mason anyway.

He'd make the side as a bowler with batting potential.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
That's fine, but what if one of those guys gets hit out of the attack? Who do we turn to then?
Considering you have three bowlers making up twenty overs, you still have room for someone to be hit out of the attack.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
NZTailender said:
Nice, but if I may :sleep:

Vincent
Astle
Fleming
Fulton
Styris
Oram
McCullum
Vettori
Mills
Bond
Mason

Patel
How
Marshall
Taylor
Oram having nosebleeds at #6 in an ODI...
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Prince EWS said:
Oram having nosebleeds at #6 in an ODI...
Indeed. Not sure what the justification of batting Oram ahead of Vettori is, let alone ahead of McCullum.

Granted, there's really not much between them.
Oram since the Natwest Series in 2004:
207 runs @ 23.00

McCullum since NWS 2004:
503 @ 23.95

Vettori since NWS 2004:
320 @ 21.33
 

James

Cricket Web Owner
marc71178 said:
But is Oram's batting in ODI worthy of a spot?
I would agree with you to some agree, but he hasn't really had the chances in ODIs because of where he's batting.

He has the ability to be our next "Chris Cairns", so he'll definately make the side. Especially as his bowling is continuing to improve.

I would like to see this side for the world cup with Styris, Astle and Taylor making up 10 overs between them. On what will be slow West Indian wickets I think they'll do the job fine, and that makes our batting extremely strong.

Vincent
Fleming
Astle
Fulton
Styris
Taylor
McCullum
Oram
Vettori
Mills
Bond
 

James

Cricket Web Owner
Mr Mxyzptlk said:
Indeed. Not sure what the justification of batting Oram ahead of Vettori is, let alone ahead of McCullum.

Granted, there's really not much between them.
Oram since the Natwest Series in 2004:
207 runs @ 23.00

McCullum since NWS 2004:
503 @ 23.95

Vettori since NWS 2004:
320 @ 21.33
You'll find it hard to convince a Kiwi fan that Vettori should bat ahead of McCullum and Oram.

Vettori will move up the order in time but he isn't as good with the bat as Oram or McCullum. Statistics lie :p ;)
 

Smudge

Hall of Fame Member
I'd certainly prefer Oram in with 25 overs to bat than Vettori. Luca's unorthodoxy is his strength and his weakness.
 

sirjeremy11

State Vice-Captain
I find the McCullum thing very hard to make a decision on. He is an absolute specialist at cameos. Can hit a nice 30 or so - sometimes higher.

But would he be able to step up and take a more responsible role? He could certainly maitain a good strike rate.

But would he be wasted up the order?
 

Matt52

U19 Vice-Captain
In my humble opinion

I think this team should play in the world cup.

Jesse Ryder
Nathan Astle
Ross Taylor
Stephen Fleming
Lou Vincent
Jacob Oram
Brendon McCullum
Daniel Vettori
James Franklin
Shane Bond (if he is fit)
Ian Butler (If he is fit)
Everyone is in their proper place with Ryder and Astle, 2 one day opening batsmen actually opening. (Rather than some middle order guy who drew the short straw). Taylor at 3 where he bats for CD. Fleming and Vincent in their middle order spots and the lower order pretty much picks itself. Butler and Bond give 2 genuine quick bowlers, and Ryder Astle, Taylor can chip in with the ball around the allrounders. Styris wouldnt even get a look in. I dont know how he holds his place.
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Matt52 said:
I think this team should play in the world cup.

Jesse Ryder
Nathan Astle
Ross Taylor
Stephen Fleming
Lou Vincent
Jacob Oram
Brendon McCullum
Daniel Vettori
James Franklin
Shane Bond (if he is fit)
Ian Butler (If he is fit)
Everyone is in their proper place with Ryder and Astle, 2 one day opening batsmen actually opening. (Rather than some middle order guy who drew the short straw). Taylor at 3 where he bats for CD. Fleming and Vincent in their middle order spots and the lower order pretty much picks itself. Butler and Bond give 2 genuine quick bowlers, and Ryder Astle, Taylor can chip in with the ball around the allrounders. Styris wouldnt even get a look in. I dont know how he holds his place.

I'm not sure what the chances are on Ryder making the WC squad, but if we played tomorrow I wouldn't have that squad. Vincent has been going great guns opening with Astle (although recently How has had that job).

I wouldn't have Franklin playing, unless someone like Oram was injured. Then I'd expect his batting to step up but I'm not sure if he can do that..
 

Top