True, I suppose.
He has undeniably done a decent job with Hampshire's First-Class side, mind.
True, I suppose.
He has undeniably done a decent job with Hampshire's First-Class side, mind.
RD
Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
(Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006
I bloody hope he's right about Watto.
The one, the only CW Black
Code:47.3 W Coppinger to Heads Smacked the ball straight into the groin of Iwuajoku who has fallen over, miraculously with the ball still caught in his scrotal area! Out!
My Australian X1 if Symonds is fit would be
Matthew Hayden
Adam Gilchrist
Ricky Ponting
Michael Clarke
Andrew Symonds
Michael Hussey
Shane Watson
Brad Hogg
Nathan Bracken
Glenn McGrath
Shaun Tait
Proud member of the Twenty20 is boring society
E-Mail - liamhowgate@yahoo.co.uk
MSN - liamhowgate@hotmail.com
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...-15084,00.html
Before the big game between Proteas and the Aussies the war of words has truly begun.
Does anyone else find it hilarious that, based on form alone, Michael Hussey should be dropped for Andrew Symonds?
Obviously it won't and shouldn't happen, but when form suggests you drop Hussey, your side is clearly in pretty good touch with the bat.![]()
~ Cribbage
Just goes to show a couple of old adages...
"Form is temporary, class is permanent"
"A fickle thing, is form. It can desert you at the most crucial of times".
Seriously, gutted to see Hussey miss-out against Holland. And when was the last time he scored anything of note for WA?
Is he in danger of turning into Geraint Jones?
Hussey did make a ton in NZ, though. On form it'd probably be Clarke who went, despite the 90 odd yesterday. It was only against Holland, after all. In reality, it'll be Hodge, Watson or Hayden. Anyone else is out of the question, and Hayden is extremely unlikely too.
It's a big test for Watson's value in the team, and who exactly he's being compared with. I think he's probably the #1 candidate to be dropped now, but the selectors have generally stuck with him in the past and left a batsman out because of Watson's bowling. Will be an interesting call.
I know a place where a royal flush
Can never beat a pair
Has to play for them to score for them.Originally Posted by Richard
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)