• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

World Cup Ladders

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Didn't SJS write a feature-article once?
BTW... start that West Indies thread. Soon. ;)
 

Neil Pickup

Cricket Web Moderator
Mr Mxyzptlk said:
Liam gave you Sri Lanka though. He gave Harry stupid Pakistan.
Now even less pleased with stupid Neil not checking the stupid list and doing Harry's job for him...
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
So Stupid Neil now has to do Stupid Sri Lanka having done Stupid Pakistan and made Stupid Harry's Stupid Job Stupidly Easy?



(For clarification - I AM NOT ATTACKING HARRY!!!!!!!!!! :mellow:)
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Yes, but you can get away with it, you won't get banned for making a pretty-innocent comment that gets blown out of proportion by your own carelessness in not making it clear what you meant!!!!!! :dry:
 

Matteh

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Richard said:
If Luke Wright or James Tredwell get anywhere near the World Cup we could well lose to Zimbabwe or Kenya...
I find it hard to believe Afzaal and Ealham are so far down the list, below rubbish like Mahmood, Plunkett, Harrison, Sidebottom, etc.
I also can't see Hoggard getting anywhere near ODIs again and quite rightly.
That Collingwood, Vaughan and Strauss are so high up says it all, really. :(
Most of it was done on last year's OD averages...=/
tbh i thought Ealham was well past it....

Collingwood is a fairly average batter...a fairly average bowler...but his fielding puts him in almost alone
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
No-one can ever be selected for fielding, it's just a side-consideration.
IMO Collingwood is below average in batting and bowling and is extremely lucky to still be in the picture for ODIs.
 
Last edited:

Matteh

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
39 year old Trevor Penney....picked as a subsitute fielder in the Ashes purely for his fielding....(but that's a completely different situation in all fairness)
Arguably though he only got picked for warks. so long because of his fielding....
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Richard said:
No-one can ever be selected for fielding, it's just a side-consideration.
IMO Collingwood is below average in batting and fielding and is extremely lucky to still be in the picture for ODIs.
Collingwood below average in fielding.

What tripe will you spout next?
 

Dizzy #4

International 12th Man
If Collingwood's below average in fielding, then Banglandesh can win both series againest Australia this year

Canada's Ladder

1 John Davison (Far and away)

DAY LIGHT

2 Nick De Groot
3 Nick Ifull
4 Desmon Chumney
5 Austin Coordinton
6 Ian Billcliff
7 Ashish Patel
8 Ashish Bagai
9 Sanjay Thuraisigam
10 Abdul Samad
11 Joe Harris
12 Ishwar Maraj
13 Davis Joseph
14 Barry Seebaran
15 Fazil Samad
16 Geroge Coordinton
17 Han Dhillion
18 Jason Sandher
19 Qaiser Ali
20 Bital Khan

Canada have named thier 40 man squad, with the eviction of Zubin Surkari after disapointing performances in the ICC trophy
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
marc71178 said:
Collingwood below average in fielding.

What tripe will you spout next?
Nought but a typo, and most people would probably realise that instead of trying to concoct stupidity.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Matteh said:
39 year old Trevor Penney....picked as a subsitute fielder in the Ashes purely for his fielding....(but that's a completely different situation in all fairness)
Arguably though he only got picked for warks. so long because of his fielding....
Trevor Penney was a good batsman, just like one Jonathan Neil Rhodes. For fielders that good, their batting often gets overlooked.
 

Matteh

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Richard said:
Trevor Penney was a good batsman, just like one Jonathan Neil Rhodes. For fielders that good, their batting often gets overlooked.
But you'd hardly say he was anywhere near one of the top 15 in the country for batting....
he averaged about low to mid 30s...hit the one OD century in over 200 attempts...so basically a county level batsman who would never expect to play for England
 

The Baconator

International Vice-Captain
Matteh said:
39 year old Trevor Penney....picked as a subsitute fielder in the Ashes purely for his fielding....(but that's a completely different situation in all fairness)
Arguably though he only got picked for warks. so long because of his fielding....
He was the fielding coach.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Matteh said:
But you'd hardly say he was anywhere near one of the top 15 in the country for batting....
he averaged about low to mid 30s...hit the one OD century in over 200 attempts...so basically a county level batsman who would never expect to play for England
Well... he didn't play for England and never looked like doing.
What's your point?
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
Richard said:
Nought but a typo, and most people would probably realise that instead of trying to concoct stupidity.
It wasn`t like you just mis-typed a few letters. It was a completely different word. :laugh:
 

Matteh

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Richard said:
Well... he didn't play for England and never looked like doing.
What's your point?
In the post before you said he was good batsman, said he didn't get the recognition he deserved and compared him to a test level cricketer....
He did play for England....although only as a fielder
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Matteh said:
In the post before you said he was good batsman, said he didn't get the recognition he deserved and compared him to a test level cricketer....
He did play for England....although only as a fielder
But that's totally different, because they don't monopolize a spot in the XI with a sub fielder.
 

Top