Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Indian attack on par with Aussies says Cairns and Fleming

  1. #1
    Banned wahindiawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    779

    Indian attack on par with Aussies says Cairns and Fleming

    Indian attack on par with Aussies says Cairns and Fleming
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Here is an audio clip of an interview by Cris Cairns in which he has said that the current Indian bowling attack is at par with the Australian attack. Many International TV commentators have also made similar comments very recently. What do you think about it ? Does the current Indian bowling attack combined with a strong Indian batting line-up pose a serious threat to Australia's aim of retaining the world champion title ? what if India drops Mongia and adds another bowler like Kumble or Agarkar ? would that make the bowling even more better ?

    www.rediff.com/wc2003/200...cairns.asx


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Fleming puts Indian bowling attack on par with Australia's

    After his team's demolition by the Indian pacemen, New Zealand captain Stephen Fleming was Friday forced to put them on par with the Australian bowling attack. "I am impressed with your left-armers. They are very handy," said Fleming whose side is all but out of contention of the World Cup after the 7-wicket thrashing by India. "Your fifth bowler is a worry but it's the same with Australia. At the moment the main bowlers are providing Sourav Ganguly with some good options," he said and then went about praising left-arm seamer Ashish Nehra.

    "Nehra in bowling particularly well and he has good rhythm. He is deceptively skiddy and quick," Fleming said about the bowler who was responsible for putting the brakes on New Zealand's scoring. "He was outstanding. Zaheer Khan got the wickets but I thought Nehra bowled a fantastic spell." New Zealand's fate in the World Cup now hangs on the result of Saturday's match between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe. If Sri Lanka win, New Zealand are out of the competition. Fleming conceded his side had never looked like a serious contender in the tournament.

    "We never got the feeling we were in a rhythm to win the World Cup. It's a tough campaign and we were too stuttering. We never really got into the stride," he said. New Zealand sneaked into the Super Six stage after rains forced South Africa and Sri Lanka to split points in the last league game in Pool B. "Last time we were pretty close to packing our bags. I guess we should now go through the same routine," Fleming said. New Zealand were skittled for 146 in 45.1 overs after being surprisingly put into bat by the Indian skipper. Fleming said he would have elected to bat had he won the toss.

    "I would have batted. There were cracks on the strip and if we had a good score, it would have been tough for the Indians to chase," he said. "It wasn't a collapse. It was bad form all through. We didn't give our 100 per cent on such an occasion and such a brilliant batting pitch. I have no answer for it except being very disappointed." Fleming acknowledged the efforts of Rahul Dravid and Mohammad Kaif, who saw their side through with their 129-run unfinished partnership, but said the match was won by the Indian bowlers. "I have no doubt it was the Indian bowlers," he said. "When you are chasing 147, even when early wickets are lost, the batsmen can take their time to reassess the situation, judge the bowling and then go about scoring.

    "Having said that, Kaif and Dravid batted very well. Dravid is a quality player and both had a good opportunity to get into rhythm," he said. Kaif and Dravid came together when India were in trouble at 21 for three in the fifth over. Dravid, who finished unbeaten on 53, could have been out for one had wicketkeeper Brendon McCullum not dropped a straight forward chance. Kaif, who made 68 not out, was also lucky in the early part of the innings when a few uppish drives just eluded the fielders. "Dropped catches are always disappointing, more so because it involved Rahul. But 146 was never enough. To win the game, you needed to take all the chances. "As for that dropped chance by Brendon, I could not really see it because I had tears in my eye," he said.

    rediff.com/wc2003/2003/mar/14flem.htm

  2. #2
    Eyes not spreadsheets marc71178's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    57,796
    For someone who's quite widely regarded as the best Captain around, he's not a very good judge!

    There is no way anyone could realistically compare the 2 attacks, and I'm sure the majority of Indians would agree there.

    I wonder if this has anything to do with their poor performance with the bat the other day?
    marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

    Anyone want to join the Society?

    Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.

  3. #3
    Tim
    Tim is offline
    Cricketer Of The Year Tim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    7,888
    But in that article when did Fleming ever say that India was on par with Australia? he just said that they have a similar problem with a 5th bowling option.

    Chris Cairns did but then again he's said alot of stupid things during this tournament i.e. Ponting a bad captain, traps for Tendulkar, dangerous form around the corner..

    Maybe he should have stayed clear of the Tiger Tiger nightclub.

  4. #4
    International Debutant
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Nere a Spoon
    Posts
    2,873
    They dont even compair.


  5. #5
    Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator Neil Pickup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    26,857
    I know who I'd rather see England facing.
    MSN Messenger: minardineil2000 at hotmail dot com | AAAS Chairman
    CricketWeb Black | CricketWeb XI Captain
    ClarkeWatch: We're Watching Rikki - Are You?

    Up The Grecians - Exeter City FC

    Completing the Square: My Cricket Web Blog

  6. #6
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Top_Cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    23,192
    If you're talking form, then the India attack does compare favourably but is pipped by the Aussies attack right now. If you're talking performance over a long period of time, well there's no comparison. I thought Zaheer Khan bowled absolutely brilliantly against NZ but on other occasions, he's been belted. Nehra bowled superbly against England but then went for 72 off his ten (next game was it??). And Srinath is, well, Srinath; consistent as always.

    Having said that, it's nice to see the Indian team with a little aggressive fast bowling firepower. I saw Nehra got clocked at 149km/h this tournament and Khan has unleased a 147km/h ball too. That's far from slow and to be honest, it's probably the main reason India have done so well thusfar. The batting (well Sachin anyway) has been good as usual but these pacers needed to step-up a lot, especially given that The Turbanator hasn't fired yet.

    Can they challenge Australia? For sure. To do it, they'll need both quick bowlers bowling well and then someone or a few someones to bat around Sachin.
    The Colourphonics

    Bandcamp
    Twitderp

  7. #7
    Eyes not spreadsheets marc71178's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    57,796
    Originally posted by Tim
    But in that article when did Fleming ever say that India was on par with Australia? he just said that they have a similar problem with a 5th bowling option.
    Reading it again, I see what you mean!!

    I'd also like to know who the "Many International TV commentators" who have also made similar comments are?

  8. #8
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Top_Cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    23,192
    I second that, Marc. I'm interested to know who else has said anything of the sort.

  9. #9
    Request Your Custom Title Now! Simon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    25,599
    considering flemming is such a good smart captain, i cant believe he would say something as stupid as that.

  10. #10
    Tim
    Tim is offline
    Cricketer Of The Year Tim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    7,888
    Well the media as good as they are have typically twisted the comments as close as they can to what they want to be read.

    Fleming never in that article stated India's bowling attack was on par with Australia's he just made a reference saying that they had similar 5th bowling option problems.

    It was Cairns who made the statement & in the last 2 weeks i'd have to say he's totally lost the plot with some of things he's said in the media. Its ok to publically target players or criticise them just as long as you're performing yourself & Cairns never came close to that in the World Cup.

  11. #11
    International Captain masterblaster's Avatar
    Netblazer3D Champion!
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    6,065
    I dont think the Indian attack is on par with McGrath, Lee, Gillespie, Bichel, Hogg yet.

    These boys (Zaheer, Nehra) are still very young, and have a lot of potential.
    Self Elected Vice-President of AAAS
    (Ajit Agarkar Appreciation Society)


    "Uniting Ajit Agarkar Fans World Wide"

    Always Live Life With: Intensity, Integrity and Intelligence

  12. #12
    Hall of Fame Member age_master's Avatar
    Plasmanaut on Fire Champion!
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Sydney, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    15,777
    the indian attack combined is not as fast as Lee or as accurate as McGrath
    Member of CW Green
    Kerry O'Keefe - Worlds funniest Commentator

  13. #13
    Rik
    Rik is offline
    Cricketer Of The Year Rik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Shropshire, England
    Posts
    8,353
    At the moment I would rate Harbajan as a better spinner than Hogg but Harbajan needs to start performing again.
    "Age is just a stupid number"

    20...that's a rather big number :(:(:(

  14. #14
    Cricketer Of The Year Anil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Tattooine
    Posts
    9,843
    Originally posted by age_master
    the indian attack combined is not as fast as Lee or as accurate as McGrath
    Maybe not, but the following figures are not a laughing matter either:

    J Srinath Ind 9 matches 271 runs 15 wickets 18.07 average 4/30 best 29.67 strike rate 3.65 r.p.o

    Zaheer Khan Ind 9 matches 293 runs 15 wickets 19.53 average 4/42 best 28.80 strike rate 4.07 r.p.o

    A Nehra Ind 7 matches 221 runs 13 wickets 17.00 average 6/23 best 25.00 strike rate 4.08 r.p.o

    Harbhajan Singh Ind 8 matches 254 runs 9 wickets 28.22 average 2/28 best 44.89 strike rate 3.77 r.p.o

    It's an impressive performance whichever way you look at it.
    Quote Originally Posted by FRAZ View Post
    very very close friend of mine is an Arab Christian and he speaks Arabic too and the visible hidden filth shows the mentality which may never change .....
    Quote Originally Posted by FRAZ View Post
    AAooouchh !!!!!
    I still remember that zipper accident of mine when I was in kindergarten ..... (Thing is OK I repeat thing is OK now )!!!

  15. #15
    Eyes not spreadsheets marc71178's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    57,796
    They have bowled well in this Tournament, but there is no way you can compare them favourably with Australia.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •