I'm not a member.
No I'm just a little tired of "We didn't loose because the opposition was better, it was the pitch/conditions/someone wished bad luck on us." Likewise for picking Brett Lee and Andy Symonds in the best fielders list, they are good fielders yes but I have seen better. Admittedly you have probably seen them more than other players round the world but the fact that you kept on saying they were the best threw away that excuse.
Actually we do base it on facts, and tons of them at that. Andy Symonds simply is just not one of the best fielders in the world, Jonty Rhodes is. Anyone who can jump up in the air, knock a ball up then catch it behind him when still falling like he did in the last world cup can rightly be called the best fielder in the world. Symonds hasn't done that. Also stop going on about honesty, when England were winning the last Test all we heard from you was "it's only because Warne and McGrath are out" or "we will still win anyway" but did you? No, so that takes away the "honesty" arguement. Your views can be biased, just like anyone else.
First of all it is "pretty" not "pritty." Marc's arguement was actually rather good. I think if you ask other posters in this forum they would feel the same. It's not Marc's arguement that is pathetic, it is the basis for your case, which comprises of personal views at the moment, no hard facts.