Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Meeting Outcomes..

  1. #1
    Cricketer Of The Year Blewy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Your house
    Posts
    9,964

    Meeting Outcomes..

    Ok well the Meeting was held and here is what come out of it...

    Attendees: Blewy, Marc, Rich, Neil Pickup

    1st Issue was the Sim issue about the rookies and the Old guys...
    It was decided that the rookies would be effected by inexperience for the 1st season in the WCC (approx 20 games) then after that they would be at full strength, However some players will start off at full potential immediatley, this will be a completelty Random factor...

    As for the Older guys, they will start to slowly decline at the age of 32 until they retire, however players of Great ability will diminish less and also start diminishing later..
    (Note. These issues are subject to Sriram being able to implement them into the sim)


    Forfeit and the new SIM
    Forfeits will no longer be part of the new sim, If you fail to submit your side the team will be selected by the simmer, The warning system will remain in place but the team will not be effected by the non submission...

    Temporary Seasonal Board Member
    As of Season 4 a Temporary Board Member will be brought onto the board for a period of 1 season, This person will be voted on by his peers to represent them at Board Meetings and in any Board discussion... Members will be able to nominate themselves for the position although they must have someone second their nomination. Once Nominations are put forward a vote will be conducted where every member will vote on who they wish to be their voice. The period will be for 1 season...

    Trading Issue
    It has been decided that Trading will remain the same but in addition the feeder process will be put in place(providing we can find a way in which teams can be ranked)..
    The feeder System(suggested by Rich) will run in conjunction with the current system where there are no restrictions on trading other than trades must be of equal amount (1 for1, 2 for 2 etc).. No club will be forced to retain any player...
    If a fair system for the Feeder program cannot be found then trading will remain the same as it currently is...


    Possible Trading Overview Committee
    A suggestion was made to have a committee implemented to overlook trades to ensure they are fair and not 1 sided...
    This will be looked into and if it is implemented will consist of people voted by the members + myself and Rich...
    As i have said this is to cut out any extremely unfair deals...


    Please Leave your feedback, and also make suggestions on the Feeder Club issue in the thread (Rich's Idea)....

  2. #2
    Request Your Custom Title Now! Mr Mxyzptlk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad)
    Posts
    36,795
    I'm happy with the decisions of the Board. They seem fair. Also, I like the idea of the Overview Committee...
    Sreesanth said, "Next ball he was beaten and I said, 'is this the King Charles Lara? Who is this impostor, moving around nervously? I should have kept my mouth shut for the next ball - mind you, it was a length ball - Lara just pulled it over the church beyond the boundary! He is a true legend."


  3. #3
    International Captain nibbs's Avatar
    Chopper Challenge Champion! Roulette Champion!
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    6,875
    feeder club issue. I think this should be optional. ie, if Surrey and Mashonaland where forced to join, Marc could get depressed at the thought of his players joining Rik. Perhaps teams can form alliances with other sides, but the board could perhaps approve these partnerships, ie Division One sides would not be allowed to join up with another division one side. etc
    "Matt Damon"

  4. #4
    Hall of Fame Member age_master's Avatar
    Plasmanaut on Fire Champion!
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Sydney, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    15,777
    Originally posted by nibblet
    feeder club issue. I think this should be optional. ie, if Surrey and Mashonaland where forced to join, Marc could get depressed at the thought of his players joining Rik. Perhaps teams can form alliances with other sides, but the board could perhaps approve these partnerships, ie Division One sides would not be allowed to join up with another division one side. etc
    no this should not be optional, it has been optional in the past for clubs to do this sort of thing now it shouuld be compulsrory.
    Member of CW Green
    Kerry O'Keefe - Worlds funniest Commentator


  5. #5
    International Captain nibbs's Avatar
    Chopper Challenge Champion! Roulette Champion!
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    6,875
    Originally posted by age_master
    no this should not be optional, it has been optional in the past for clubs to do this sort of thing now it shouuld be compulsrory.
    What would clubs like ACT, Warwickshire and Western Province do? I'd rate us all around the middle, if your ranking clubs. Who would we join with?

  6. #6
    U19 Captain
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    ...
    Posts
    641
    Originally posted by nibblet
    Perhaps teams can form alliances with other sides, but the board could perhaps approve these partnerships, ie Division One sides would not be allowed to join up with another division one side. etc
    Nah i dont think alliances will work as the purpose is for the weaker teams to get stronger players. If div 1 teams are teaming up with div 3 teams then div 5 arent getting any stronger.

  7. #7
    Cricket Web XI Moderator lord_of_darkness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Auckland , New Zealand
    Posts
    13,252
    Temporary Seasonal Board Member
    As of Season 4 a Temporary Board Member will be brought onto the board for a period of 1 season, This person will be voted on by his peers to represent them at Board Meetings and in any Board discussion... Members will be able to nominate themselves for the position although they must have someone second their nomination. Once Nominations are put forward a vote will be conducted where every member will vote on who they wish to be their voice. The period will be for 1 season...
    Like this one a lot really.. thanks a lot g.b for putting forward one of my suggestions !
    Don L-o-d , Legion Of Doom

    Lords Lounge, Off Topic, The Happening Place in CW and OT.

    Co Chairman CWBCC - Cricketweb XI - CW Green | Manager of Hampshire CC - Wccc | Chairman of the Muralitharan Supporters Club ~MSC~ |

    Current Stats:
    2* - 17-4-35-3 - Season Ends..

    Current Record
    Batting - RHB: M:48 Inns:43 Runs:457 H/S:33* Ave:15.5 N.O:10
    Bowling - Off Spin: O:280 M:40 Runs:975 Wickets:104 Ave:9.3 S.R:15.6

  8. #8
    International Vice-Captain
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    .
    Posts
    4,710
    i personally quite like the outcome.

  9. #9
    Cricketer Of The Year bugssy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    8,213
    i like the feeter club rule. i would be happy to help out any div 5 side if they would want nsw help at the moment
    Career cricket
    311 wickets @16.54 and 3021 runs @ 34.56 from 176 games over 11 years H.S 178*
    Member of the CW Green
    Cricket Web Career:(end of season 11) FC: 7404 runs @ 30.85 H.S 253* : One Day: 7331 runs @ 48.55 H.S 155*
    Off season: FC 1209 @ 52.51 & One Day: 921 @ 92.10
    COD4: djs clan
    World Of Warcraft: just sensational

  10. #10
    Hall of Fame Member age_master's Avatar
    Plasmanaut on Fire Champion!
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Sydney, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    15,777
    The Colts would like to thank the members of the board for making what it believes are excellent decisions keep up the good work boys

  11. #11
    Eyes not spreadsheets marc71178's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    57,674
    Looks to me like the big winners here are ACT - already a strong side, and likely to be paired with a top side...
    marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

    Anyone want to join the Society?

    Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.

  12. #12
    Cricketer Of The Year bugssy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    8,213
    i would be happy to merge with a div 4 side or div 3 side, what ever is best for wcc

  13. #13
    Rik
    Rik is offline
    Cricketer Of The Year Rik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Shropshire, England
    Posts
    8,353
    Originally posted by nibblet
    feeder club issue. I think this should be optional. ie, if Surrey and Mashonaland where forced to join, Marc could get depressed at the thought of his players joining Rik. Perhaps teams can form alliances with other sides, but the board could perhaps approve these partnerships, ie Division One sides would not be allowed to join up with another division one side. etc
    Hahaha, I wouldn't take them anyway :P

    I wouldn't mind a bit of clarification on the Feeder Issue, as I don't really see the point of it.
    "Age is just a stupid number"

    20...that's a rather big number :(:(:(

  14. #14
    Cricket Web Vice Administrator
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    7,190
    Originally posted by Rik
    Hahaha, I wouldn't take them anyway :P

    I wouldn't mind a bit of clarification on the Feeder Issue, as I don't really see the point of it.
    Basically your paired with a stronger side and you get given free players, rather than having to go through the hassle of trading where it can be hard for the lesser clubs to attrate the better players (However this will run with the trade and draft) so you get all the normal ways, plus upto 6 freebies that you can throw away, keep or keep and use as a trading tool if they are good but don't fit into your side.

    If you think the idea is pointless, Kent will take D Fulton and Ed Smith back, as the feeder idea was basically that, where I gave you two decent bats for your two worse players as I knew I wouldn't be able to keep them. :saint:
    Last edited by Rich2001; 28-08-2003 at 02:30 PM.

  15. #15
    Rik
    Rik is offline
    Cricketer Of The Year Rik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Shropshire, England
    Posts
    8,353
    Originally posted by Rich2001
    Basically your paired with a stronger side and you get given free players, rather than having to go through the hassle of trading where it can be hard for the lesser clubs to attrate the better players (However this will run with the trade and draft) so you get all the normal ways, plus upto 6 freebies that you can throw away, keep or keep and use as a trading tool if they are good but don't fit into your side.

    If you think the idea is pointless, Kent will take D Fulton and Ed Smith back, as the feeder idea was basically that, where I gave you two decent bats for your two worse players as I knew I wouldn't be able to keep them. :saint:
    Well now you have explained it ok I agree it's not pointless, I'll give it more time though. I still don't see what's so wrong with the draft though, you don't want players just given to you, you want make your side better by good deals and doing well and getting higher in the draft.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •