Go Back   Cricket Web > Archived Forums > Archived Forums > Twenty20 World Cup



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-09-2007, 07:45 PM   #16 (permalink)
International Coach
 
pup11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: India
Posts: 12,134
I think its more to do with the unpredictable nature of T20 cricket that has led to Australia losing games in this series, i think the major problem with Australia is when they have batted first they haven't been able to set a decent target on the board (because they try to get 400 of 20 overs, atleast that is the way they bat) i think Australia should assess the pitch-conditions well a set a realistic target for them and then bat accordingly.
Btw, wasn't Watto a part of the Australian team in the CB series Final 1, Final 2 and the 3 games in the C-H series in New Zealand?
pup11 is offline  
Old 19-09-2007, 07:50 PM   #17 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Prince EWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 37,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by pup11 View Post
I think its more to do with the unpredictable nature of T20 cricket that has led batted to Australia losing games in this series, i think the major problem with Australia is when they have first they haven't been able to set a decent target on the board (because they try to get 400 of 20 overs, atleast that is the way they bat) i think Australia should assess the pitch-conditions well a set a realistic target for them and then bat accordingly.
Nah, all Watto IMO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pup11
Btw, wasn't Watto a part of the Australian team in the CB series Final 1, Final 2 and the 3 games in the C-H series in New Zealand?
Well, he was only just coming back from injury then. Also...
*amnesia dust*
__________________
~ Cribbage
Prince EWS is offline  
Old 19-09-2007, 07:51 PM   #18 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Prince EWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 37,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
FFS, we may be bad, but we're not that bad!
If you lose against Australia without Watson then yes, you are.
Prince EWS is offline  
Old 20-09-2007, 06:18 AM   #19 (permalink)
You'll Never Walk Alone
 
Nnanden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 26,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by pup11 View Post
Btw, wasn't Watto a part of the Australian team in the CB series Final 1, Final 2 and the 3 games in the C-H series in New Zealand?
Shut up, or we'll make you shut up.
__________________
Jesus saves

proudly supporting Liverpool FC
Nnanden is offline  
Old 20-09-2007, 06:29 AM   #20 (permalink)
State Vice-Captain
 
Poker Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kilbirnie, Scotland
Posts: 1,105
I think Ponting, Hayden, Gilchritst, Hussey and Lee might disagree with this argument...Mind you they won today with him (but he didn't finish his spell. He was clutching his hamstring). The Aussies thought he would be their answer to Flintoff. He is. He's an allrounder who can't stay fit either....
__________________
Ian Botham, Freddie Flintoff, Kevin Pietersen, Brian Laudrup, Gazza and Daniela Hantuchova....a fan of you all FOREVER!!!
Can't wait to see Australia field a crap leg-spinner like Hollland or Hohns again.....
Congratulations to Daniela Hantuchova on her 3rd career title....
Bob Woolmer 1948-2007..farewell to the best coach England never had...
Arise Sir Beefy....
Pugh, Pugh, Barney McGrew, Cuthbert, Dibble, Grubb...
Poker Boy is offline  
Old 20-09-2007, 06:32 AM   #21 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Prince EWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 37,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poker Boy View Post
I think Ponting, Hayden, Gilchritst, Hussey and Lee might disagree with this argument...Mind you they won today with him (but he didn't finish his spell. He was clutching his hamstring). The Aussies thought he would be their answer to Flintoff. He is. He's an allrounder who can't stay fit either....
Exactly. Watson played and Australia were back to their brutal best. He's so good he doesn't even have to play well; he just has to be there.
Prince EWS is offline  
Old 20-09-2007, 07:30 AM   #22 (permalink)
International Regular
 
Josh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,903
Please...
Josh is offline  
Old 20-09-2007, 07:33 AM   #23 (permalink)
State Regular
 
readie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh View Post
Please...
beat me to it lol
readie is offline  
Old 20-09-2007, 07:38 AM   #24 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
TT Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: .
Posts: 16,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Quite the opposite, from the little attention I've been paying. Some of the Twenty20 "specialists" seem to have been among few to have performed for England in this tournament. It's the Test players who've not done much.
Test cricketers were England’s best performers… KP topped the batting averages whilst Anderson and Flintoff were England’s best bowlers, in regards to wickets and economy.
TT Boy is offline  
Old 21-09-2007, 03:32 AM   #25 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 2005
Posts: 80,407
And who came 2nd and 3rd and 4th in the batting?
__________________
RD
Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
(Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
Quote:
chris.hinton: h
FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006
Richard is offline  
Old 21-09-2007, 05:53 AM   #26 (permalink)
International Coach
 
grecian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hanging on !
Posts: 11,285
Well considering England only picked about three Test regulars in their top order, and Colly has had a terrible series. I'm guessing most of them will be ODI or twenty/20 specialist. A fairly tenuous defence of a clearly wrong statement, IMHO.

Apart from colly (who you don't think should be playing Tests anyway) who are the Test players, you used the plural, who failed to perform?
__________________
Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.
Walt Whitman

Last edited by grecian; 21-09-2007 at 06:00 AM.
grecian is offline  
Old 21-09-2007, 02:15 PM   #27 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
Perm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Clutha Valley, New Zealand
Posts: 21,817
Quote:
Originally Posted by grecian View Post
Apart from colly (who you don't think should be playing Tests anyway) who are the Test players, you used the plural, who failed to perform?
Prior and Collingwood are the two I can think of. I suppose you could say Flintoff's batting and Broad as a bowler.
__________________
The Future of International Cricket - Rohit Sharma, Suresh Raina, Ravi Bopara, Tim Southee, Ross Taylor, Shahriar Nafees, Raqibul Hasan, Salman Butt, JP Duminy
Proud Supporter of the Bangladeshi Tigers
Ryan ten Doeschate - A Legend in the Making
MSN: zacattack90@hotmail.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Romance can be dealt with elsewhere - I just don't enjoy it in cricket.
Perm is offline  
Old 21-09-2007, 02:20 PM   #28 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 2005
Posts: 80,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by grecian View Post
Well considering England only picked about three Test regulars in their top order, and Colly has had a terrible series. I'm guessing most of them will be ODI or twenty/20 specialist. A fairly tenuous defence of a clearly wrong statement, IMHO.

Apart from colly (who you don't think should be playing Tests anyway) who are the Test players, you used the plural, who failed to perform?
I'm more bothered about "Twenty20 specialists" who didn't fail really.
Richard is offline  
Old 21-09-2007, 02:21 PM   #29 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
Perm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Clutha Valley, New Zealand
Posts: 21,817
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
I'm more bothered about "Twenty20 specialists" who didn't fail really.
Well who were the Test players who failed to perform?
Perm is offline  
Old 21-09-2007, 02:27 PM   #30 (permalink)
International Coach
 
grecian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hanging on !
Posts: 11,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perm View Post
Prior and Collingwood are the two I can think of. I suppose you could say Flintoff's batting and Broad as a bowler.

Well, Broad hasn't played Tests yet. Freddies batted as well as he has in Tests recently.

You have a point with Prior.

The Test players did better then the Twenty/20 specialists in general, though. Shah and Mascarenas are now regulars in the ODI team, which was why they were in the squad.

Snape, Maddy, Kirtley all had negligible tournaments. Wright was shocking.. Schofield did OK, but as has been said, he wasn't one of the top bowlers.

Last edited by grecian; 21-09-2007 at 02:31 PM.
grecian is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Battrick Team Details superkingdave Battrick 72 04-08-2007 02:40 AM
interesting article. sledger Cricket Chat 53 13-02-2006 03:48 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:28 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web