Am I the only one that thinks this is a ridiculous way of deciding a match?
If the game must be split not tied, then surely it would be better to give the win to the team with the most wickets - at least that is a reflection of what has gone on in the match. You could go further down this track as well of needed (eg most wickets 'bowled' or most stumpings). You could even do it on dropped catches, anything really rather than the farcical bowl out.
May as well get all the players to spin round looking at the sky holding a stump to their foreheads and see who falls down last.