Cricket Web

Cricket Web (http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/)
-   Twenty20 World Cup (http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/twenty20-world-cup/)
-   -   Murali out of Twenty20 World Cup (http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/twenty20-world-cup/27225-murali-out-twenty20-world-cup.html)

James 30-08-2007 02:24 AM

Murali out of Twenty20 World Cup
 
Murali out of Twenty20 World Cup

JASON 30-08-2007 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James (Post 1306752)

It doesn't alter Sri Lanka's chances or fortunes at 20/20. Murali is pretty poor when it comes to batting and someone like Lokuaraatchchi who will replace him is a damn good slogger in the limited versions of the game and a very good Bat even in FC Cricket.

I don't think Murali's bowling would make a huge difference in 20/20 . That's just my personal opinion.

Murali is needed for SL tour of Australia which is IMHO the No.1 priority ATM.And everything else is insignificant. Thats my personal opinion.

Jungle Jumbo 30-08-2007 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASON (Post 1306760)
It doesn't alter Sri Lanka's chances or fortunes at 20/20. Murali is pretty poor when it comes to batting and someone like Lokuaraatchchi who will replace him is a damn good slogger in the limited versions of the game and a very good Bat even in FC Cricket.

I don't think Murali's bowling would make a huge difference in 20/20 . That's just my personal opinion.

You don't think Murali's bowling would make much impact, despite the fact that he has one of the best Twenty20 records of any spinner in English Twenty20.

In eight games in all Twenty20 cricket, he has 17 wickets - over two a game - at an average of 9.17 and an economy rate of 5.37. They are almost unbelievably good stats. Murali would probably have been the first choice bowler for any side. Players like Lokuarachchi who can offer a bit with the bat won't have as much impact as you expect - Twenty20 games are largely won by the top 4, top 6 at a push.

JASON 30-08-2007 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jungle Jumbo (Post 1306765)
You don't think Murali's bowling would make much impact, despite the fact that he has one of the best Twenty20 records of any spinner in English Twenty20.

In eight games in all Twenty20 cricket, he has 17 wickets - over two a game - at an average of 9.17 and an economy rate of 5.37. They are almost unbelievably good stats. Murali would probably have been the first choice bowler for any side. Players like Lokuarachchi who can offer a bit with the bat won't have as much impact as you expect - Twenty20 games are largely won by the top 4, top 6 at a push.

You probably have a point there.....But as a Sri Lankan I really want SL to remain focussed on the Australian Series. I really won't be bothered if SL don't even make it past the Group Stages....:laugh:

Jono 30-08-2007 03:35 AM

Murali can now concentrate on the real stuff in Australia. Blessing in disguise.

TT Boy 30-08-2007 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASON (Post 1306760)
It doesn't alter Sri Lanka's chances or fortunes at 20/20. Murali is pretty poor when it comes to batting and someone like Lokuaraatchchi who will replace him is a damn good slogger in the limited versions of the game and a very good Bat even in FC Cricket.

I don't think Murali's bowling would make a huge difference in 20/20 . That's just my personal opinion.

Good job that his in the side for his bowling then... How anyone can suggest that Murali's loss is somehow Sri Lanka's gain in regard to this tournament is gone. His Sri Lanka’s best bowler and has shown (as Jumbo said) in English domestic 20/20 that his mightily affective.

His loss is an absolutely huge blow to Sri Lanka’s chances.

Jungle Jumbo 30-08-2007 03:28 PM

I'd go further and say that if you were picking a world Twenty20 side from scratch, Murali would be my first pick.

Perm 31-08-2007 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jungle Jumbo (Post 1307515)
I'd go further and say that if you were picking a world Twenty20 side from scratch, Murali would be my first pick.

Definately be one of the first names on the teamsheet, Sri Lankas chances have definately been dented.

JASON 31-08-2007 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perm (Post 1307764)
Definately be one of the first names on the teamsheet, Sri Lankas chances have definately been dented.

I am really not disappointed, but rather pleased that he will take the time off and come refreshed against the Aussies where SL really need him.

I am only hoping he is not going to use this to take an extended period off Cricket, under the excuse of "injury" to avoid going to Australia.

James 31-08-2007 07:40 PM

Murali could still make World Cup

JASON 31-08-2007 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James (Post 1308405)

My personal feeling is he should just sit out the 20/20 and come firing in Australia.

My biggest fear, he will play 20/20 and then (because he really doesn't want to go to Australia, in his own mind) find an injury excuse to not go to Australia.

JASON 02-09-2007 12:05 AM

The latest is Murali is definitely out of 20/20.

Julian87 04-09-2007 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jono (Post 1306798)
Murali can now concentrate on the real stuff in Australia. Blessing in disguise.

Oh he is actually going to com thi tim is he. I thought he was still protesting about all of us who call out no ball in the middle of his bowling stride.

The_Bunny 04-09-2007 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jungle Jumbo (Post 1307515)
I'd go further and say that if you were picking a world Twenty20 side from scratch, Murali would be my first pick.

Second for mine, after Flintoff and before Ponting.
But he would be a huge loss for any side, I know Aus could use him :p

JASON 07-09-2007 06:11 PM

If Sri Lanka make it to the last 4 -wouldn't be surprised if Murali's injury makes a miraculous recovery and he gets flown in to SA .:)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:08 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web