• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who would win a test series between England and West Indies if play started tomorrow?

Who would win?


  • Total voters
    74

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
I base my prediction on particular things:

1. Generally teams score a lot of runs against the West Indies. In that way, the West Indies has found it easier to take games to the fifth day, albeit without a chance of winning.
2. In a low scoring game such as the one listed above, the West Indies would have a chance of winning. I don't expect them to have a chance of winning a Test against England in a lowscoring affair.
I see why you predicted that then. The reason I feel all 5 tests wont reach 5 days would be because I do see at least 1 lower scoring game (in at least 1 or 2 innings ultimately leading to less than 5 days) in 5 tests played between the two sides apart from other factors which might influence. Cheers mate.
 

Beleg

International Regular
^

I guess some of the assertions in the first couple of pages of this thread made me a wee bit peevish. :p
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
I'd not begrudge you your peevishness.

We Brits do do pretty well of times at living in the past.
 

Fiery

Banned
Sydney Morning Herald:

NEW Zealand put another nail into the coffin of England's disastrous Australian tour, beating Andrew Flintoff and his clueless comrades by 58 runs in their tri-series international in Perth last night.

:laugh: ...(sorry England)
 

Turbinator

Cricketer Of The Year
Sydney Morning Herald:

NEW Zealand put another nail into the coffin of England's disastrous Australian tour, beating Andrew Flintoff and his clueless comrades by 58 runs in their tri-series international in Perth last night.

:laugh: ...(sorry England)
Dude you're really rubbing it in :p. Leave them alone they have enough to moan and groan about :p.
 

Fiery

Banned
Dude you're really rubbing it in :p. Leave them alone they have enough to moan and groan about :p.
I worked for a bank in the Square Mile in London for 3 years as a Chelsea supporter surrounded by West Ham fans and still have English mates who remind me constantly about the rugby world cup. It's payback!
 
Last edited:

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Pakistan or South Africa or NZ or Sri Lanka will all kill England in a test series right now
Haha.

England the clear number two. The only teams around right now who might beat them are the subcontinent nations, and that'd only be at home. No doubt they aren't playing as well as they were in the 04-05 period, but they still played some very good cricket during the Ashes and would have smashed many teams.

In ODIs they'd lose to everyone, but that's a different matter.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
I'd respond to your argument on this, but you don't seem to have one. England got belted by Australia in the Ashes because Australia are a better team, and belted in the ODI series because they're crap at ODIs. That's all you can determine from this tour, and we pretty much knew both those things already anyway. If you seriously think New Zealand (for instance) would beat England in a test series right now, you're on the moon.
 

Fiery

Banned
I'd respond to your argument on this, but you don't seem to have one. England got belted by Australia in the Ashes because Australia are a better team, and belted in the ODI series because they're crap at ODIs. That's all you can determine from this tour, and we pretty much knew both those things already anyway. If you seriously think New Zealand (for instance) would beat England in a test series right now, you're on the moon.
Then call me Neil Armstrong
 

steds

Hall of Fame Member
I'm a bit of a Watson fan, but aside from that, not really. Just suggesting ways you could get a reaction, if that's what you're after.
He could champion first chance averages, promise to eat his computer and dismiss half the bowlers on the planet as "lucky". That always gets a reaction.


Or he could post porn.
 

Fiery

Banned
I'm a bit of a Watson fan, but aside from that, not really. Just suggesting ways you could get a reaction, if that's what you're after.
My thoughts on Watson are probably well-known and I've probably already gloated enough about Oram. Wouldn't say Oram is the best allrounder in the world yet. Kallis holds that mantle, followed by Flintoff. Would say that Oram is the most destructive batting allrounder at the moment definitely though but it's only 3 games so aren't getting too carried away. My defence of him was in response to others suggesting he wasn't good enough to bat at 6
 

Johnners

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
the thing being... no-one said he wasn't good enough to bat 6, they argued against your claim that he was a genuine ODI allrounder
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I'm taking into account their OD form as well which is...still international cricket.
England's one day performances have been horrible for ages though. It's nothing particularly new that they are losing - they were doing so even when they were winning tests against all and sundry.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
the thing being... no-one said he wasn't good enough to bat 6, they argued against your claim that he was a genuine ODI allrounder
I did indeed say that, actually. I thought, given his poor performances in ODIs to date at the time of the argument, that he should bat 7, allowing another batsman to be selected. That was before Astle retired though, mind you, so there were additional bowling options. I also gave a "When Styris is fit" condition.
 

Top