PlayerComparisons
International Debutant
Two batsmen from Asia that averaged 49
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Virender Sehwag vs Inzamam-ul-Haq
- Thread starter PlayerComparisons
- Start date
subshakerz
International Coach
Inzi. Played half his career in a tougher batting era. And has a better record outside the subcontinent.
ankitj
Hall of Fame Member
His average was boosted in the easy era though. Think he went from averaging 41 to 49 after 2000 or so.
subshakerz
International Coach
No doubt. But Sehwag played entirely in that easy era and ended up with the same average.
_00_deathscar
International Regular
…cos he was an opener.
subshakerz
International Coach
Yeah I do think opening was tougher which to me accounts for perhaps 1-2 points average difference with a middle order bat.
But the bonus of batting in an easier era is more than that, somewhere on 4 to 7 points, as demonstrated in Inzi's case.
Coronis
Cricketer Of The Year
fwiw, their stats during the overlapping period of their careers:
Sehwag 4072 runs @ 49.65
Inzamam 3530 runs @ 54.30
Sehwag 4072 runs @ 49.65
Inzamam 3530 runs @ 54.30
Can I adjust Sutcliffe’s average to 65 and call him the best after Bradman?
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Not but you can say Trumper. ?
Coronis
Cricketer Of The Year
tbf I do consider Warner > Kohli and Williamsob
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
And Smith.
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Vijay > all of them, though.
Socerer 01
International Captain
best unintended typo ever
Coronis
Cricketer Of The Year
Nah his average is high enough…for now
Xuhaib
International Coach
I hold Inzi in very high regard. One of the reason is assurance i felt with Inzi at the crease was not i got with Mo Yo or even Younis even though they had greater averages.
As for this comparison its a tie for me. Sehwag as a Pakistani fan gave me great nightmares. Him and Dravid were always the most prized wicket for me in tests with Sachin and Yuvi in odis.
As for this comparison its a tie for me. Sehwag as a Pakistani fan gave me great nightmares. Him and Dravid were always the most prized wicket for me in tests with Sachin and Yuvi in odis.
_00_deathscar
International Regular
Cos their averages when Inzi was already established but Sehwag was just coming through, and finding his position, should tell you everything.
Next up, Martin Crowe > mid 30s/early 40s averaging Sachin
I never said Sehwag > Inzi (he clearly isn’t) just that there’s obviously a reason why Sehwag’s average is unlikely to be higher than Inzi’s, an ATG player himself.
If Sehwag had an average around 53-55 or something mad like that he’d be rated much higher, obviously. But how many openers since the 70s have had averages like that?
For the record, Sehwag actually averages a shade above 50 as an opener.
_00_deathscar
International Regular
Sehwag 2003-2010 (his peak years) as opener only
72 tests
6,753 runs
19 centuries
57.22 average
84.13 strike rate
72 tests
6,753 runs
19 centuries
57.22 average
84.13 strike rate
subshakerz
International Coach
If Sehwag played in the 90s as an opener it would likely take 4-7 points off his average. I don't see him doing well in Australia and WI as he did in the 2000s with McGrath and Ambrose around.
BazBall21
International Regular
I’ve always felt that if he played against the WI 80s juggernaut he would probably have played one of the greatest innings of all time but end up averaging 32 against them