• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Shane Warne - Revolutions Per Second

Gloucefan

U19 Vice-Captain
Does anyone have any idea how many revolutions per second Warne imparts on a normal legbreak delivery. Assuming he's going for maximum turn. Has this been measured?
 

Swervy

International Captain
Does anyone have any idea how many revolutions per second Warne imparts on a normal legbreak delivery. Assuming he's going for maximum turn. Has this been measured?
see Richard about that, he conducted a 'highly scientific' survey on a load of spinners revs per second
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
see Richard about that, he conducted a 'highly scientific' survey on a load of spinners revs per second
Yeah, classic Richo. IIRC he reckoned he counted 70 revs per second or something, despite television using only 27 frames per second.
 

pasag

RTDAS
First post of the challenge thread. If England don't make the semis which he later narrowed down to the final, I get to change his avatar.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Cripes, I know Martyn's optimistic, but he must really not care about his avatar... :blink:

BTW - was yourself and Amir's transformers the result of a challenge, Rodgie-esque copycat movement, or a collusion?
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Was principally referring to Swervy and DB's comments about the FPS ratios of TV cameras - which were incorrectly quoted here and also fail to note the fact that such cameras are no longer exclusive entities.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
If he said Black was White and was questioned on it, he'd still argue he was right...
He's often accused of such, but I'd imagine most people would be the same. If he said black was white in the first place, he obviously would have had a reason to do so and points to back that opinion up.

Anyone who makes a statement obviously believes it at the time they make it, so if they are questioned on it, they will naturally argue it. Richard IMO does have a problem viewing his predictions and views with hindsight and changing them as new evidence emerges, however he seems over-criticised of this fact to the point where he even cops flak for defending his own statements within immediate timeframes.
 

Top